QUOTE(fergie1100 @ Oct 10 2008, 05:21 PM)
Tiger is betting on Chinese sentiment like funding for Chinese education. Carlsbg on games like footballs.Tiger does capture some of Carl markets.
High Dividend Counters, Better than putting in FD
|
|
Oct 10 2008, 05:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 11 2008, 12:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(hanif444 @ Oct 11 2008, 11:41 AM) if we keep take 2007 report to judge on 2008 stock now...we can see alot of potential stock with P/E 10-15 times...Yield 10-15%..but in actual is not..becoz 2008 earning are much much more lower since 2007 are PEAK period and now are bearish...let see at 2008 report then compare.. Depending on historical data alone to buy shares are very risky. Most stock brokers have the future data.And yet, they are prepared on the worst, best and achievable scenarios . You have to filter them . This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Oct 11 2008, 12:14 PM |
|
|
Jan 31 2009, 08:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
5% less tax is no much better than FD mah. FDs are Govt guaranteed, right ? Not worth the risk, lah.
Share price could go down further if there is a depression, leh . 5% div could become super low then. Added on January 31, 2009, 9:15 pm QUOTE(htt @ Jan 17 2009, 03:50 AM) Proton? This is a 'good' one, making profit while Toyota also making loss, what JIT, kanban, andon all cannot use one, spirit of 'Jepun Boleh' is all they need Proton is better than Toyota bcos it is selling at higher price than Toyota ( before adding all the taxes.)Malaysia sure boleh one. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Jan 31 2009, 09:27 PM |
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 08:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 10 2009, 07:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(kei18kun @ Dec 10 2009, 05:46 PM) If you prefer smaller cap, then take a look at REITs .I like REIT tax structure whereby you are taxed at only 10% instead of normal 25%. Smaller capital outlay and with more consistent dividend payouts. Unlikely to have special lumpy Dividends . Risk factor, many claim reits to be high risk. My personal opinion is : Moderate Risk . Judge your own. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Dec 10 2009, 07:22 PM |
|
|
Dec 10 2009, 11:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(darkknight81 @ Dec 10 2009, 09:51 PM) I would say some reit has higher risk compare with another. As you need to see type of properties they are in and also how they diversify their properties portfolio. Yes, you are right.Generally, Risks are classified into conservative, moderate and High Risk , for so called Investments. Generally, Equity is deemed to be High Risk across the board. Again for share investment, higher risk could be due to High Beta ( Big Price Movement ) and Standard Deviation and so on. For those with low beta comes with smaller risk. Growth Factor and Time Horizon. Liquidity and so on. "Higher risk" is also possible if a particular company operates in many third world countries ( emerging markets ) , or like Dubai and so on. If taking in these factors, investing in M REITS to me is quite a " Moderate" risk , my own term. Also if you spend time to understand them. No doubt, it is good to start with Fear ( by asking all sorts of Q ) than Greed ( asking for only rates of returns ). Not saying you are wrong anyway. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Dec 11 2009, 08:09 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 2 2010, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
VT sold quite a number of Golden Goose.
DIGI and Prudential Insurance are some examples. Apparently not keeping many cash cows in his group. |
|
|
Mar 6 2010, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(jasontoh @ Mar 5 2010, 09:59 AM) If I'm not mistaken, the NTA drop from RM4 to RM1.x now, so unlikely they can give >RM1 special divvy. Yes, you are right.Seriously no one looks at the reserves or retained profit they have, in order to give special dividends year in year out. To me this co is downsizing quite a lot . Reserve drops to mere rm 33m, a big part generated from Other Incomes and Gain from disposal of property ( totaling 70% ) and EPS is at best 28sen ? previously 46sen. Operating profit is about rm 9m a year from 500m turnover. Bank bal is low at 28m Where is the rm One dividend to come from ? "Too high a hope may result greater disappointments " in the future. Good luck to all. And plse correct me if I am wrong. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Mar 6 2010, 09:20 PM |
|
|
Mar 7 2010, 04:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(protonw @ Mar 6 2010, 09:26 PM) You are welcome.If market price factored in a high expectation of future dividends of 50sen a year, it is quite worrying. And Special Dividends came from selling off of some profitable businesses ( or ceasing of a profitable business in Year 2008 ). Sorry, too lazy to go into details. They have distributed a big part of dividends through Reserve built up over the years. By the way , the car market is picking up. Just do not know the net profit margin now ( last year less than 2% on average i.e 9/500 ). Just wandering why it is low for a lucrative business Take care and do more homework. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Mar 7 2010, 05:18 PM |
|
|
Mar 7 2010, 06:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(yktan83 @ Mar 7 2010, 05:49 PM) jz to add some info about CCB... Thanks for the info.they could afford to give dividend of > RM1 in past 2 years mainly due to premium of RM18million received from investment in mercedes-benz malaysia (MBM). their core business is really not profitable, they have been receiving net dividend income of RM11million/annum from MBM which is valid until dec 2012. after tat the net dividend amount might be reviewed (or terminated?) hence like wat u have said earlier, it is very unlikely to maintain dividend at > rm1.++, probably only get 5 sen of dividend Ya, the core business earns very little. Sideline business from MBM or other incomes earn more. Even that, Co needs to earn or having 100m in Reserve in order to pay RM 1 dividends ( assuming the paid up capital is rm 100m ) This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Mar 7 2010, 06:23 PM |
|
|
Mar 8 2010, 08:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
But the problem with many dividend investors ( from the info I gathered from this thread ) just invest according to the past dividends track records.
Seldom they read whether the company's core business is improving or otherwise. ( with the Exceptions of YTL Power and REITS investors ), so long the dividends are consistently given. They are more happy to get special dividends, but in fact the company concerned could be selling off very profitable business to related parties. The special dividend could be just a cover up of their great plannings. Even there is an increase in BLR, not all banks get to enjoy better profits. Some may drop in term of profits. Do not mean it is the wrong way to invest. Just Many things have been taken for granted. Best of luck to all. This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Mar 8 2010, 08:36 AM |
|
|
Jan 2 2012, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(gark @ Dec 27 2013, 01:03 PM) Nothing is fixed in this world unless u can fix the FCF for the next 10 years ...20years or more....... Otherwise it remains as a promise........Boards can be easily changed too due to aging problem......got Fixed Board of Directors This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Dec 27 2013, 01:45 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 01:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(gark @ Dec 27 2013, 01:45 PM) well a fixed percentage does not mean its always going up.. if EPS down, the divvy will down, if EPS negative, divvy is zero.... Well If EPS goes down , in fact some companies may choose to give a better Dividend payout....so people do not simply sell off the stock . price remains stable.......Hope for the better maybeThis post has been edited by SKY 1809: Dec 27 2013, 01:50 PM |
|
|
Dec 27 2013, 02:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
23,851 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
QUOTE(gark @ Dec 27 2013, 02:08 PM) Always FCF first then EPS, otherwise if both of these sliding down... the high dividend will dissapear sooner or later (once cash runs out) PLUS you then get hit with capital loss. Big Risk if a company loses a Premium Grade.........here comes the " double edged" sword, losing Capital and Dividends When looking at dividend companies, the dividend % is one of the last thing you verify. FCF, EPS growth, PE, payout ratio %, then only dividend yield... But Q is can it be of Premium Grade fixed permanently ....... This post has been edited by SKY 1809: Dec 27 2013, 02:15 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0232sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:56 AM |