from the posts i read, most users here either use bits on wheels or transmission. so which one is faster, better, takes less resources? if there's a better one, please mention..

I previously used Azurues. It's quite heavy on resources but the it has a lot of functions. It can selective download, do DHT, and run encryption.

Thanks to Tmnet, bittorrent is pretty dead right now...

azureus kinda eats too much resources.. i tried it b4 on windows, its slow too, i previously used bitcomet on windows

transmission if u want the whole mac look thingy, damn slow though

azureus if you want speed (encryption) - myself getting an average of 80kbps

usenext - if you're are willing to spend a bit (really fast, all the time)

bits on wheel? never tried

aria2c on the command line.

I heard some time back that they are developing uTorrent for Mac. It's been a while and there is still no news....

bloody bits on wheels.. crashed unexpectedly, when i reorder the arrangement.. tried dling again but its still crashing..

i'm using transmission now..

I'm a fan of Azureus.

I use xtorrent. U should try that too.

I am using Azureus.

although abit resource consuming... but alot of plugins

well i been using many torrent client when i step in to mac world. i use bitcomet with windows xp last time. in mac i use azureus, transsimission, bit on wheel and xtorrent as well. actually i got something to share. transsimission use to be light but sometimes i use it to download my torrent, but end up with no seed, when i open the same torrent with azureus the download starts just in that time. ????? bit on wheel i just tried a few times, it is light also but i didn't use it. ermm about xtorrent u need to pay for it. but i not sure do it have any crack or serial code. yeah i ever heard that utorrent will be in mac soon. well if that launch i will try that out as well.

If u want sth simple , use transmisssion .
or even simplier - Tomato .

If u want more functionality , use Azureus.

Try them out & choose 1 that u prefer. It really boils down to own personal perference.

yes i agree with u. but guys remember Azureus is an heavy application.

hmm, only Azureus support encryption,right? (beside Deluge, which is a little bit hard to setup)

Thanks.

i used Azureus so far the speed is ok to me. Sometimes need to find some song i used limewire

I am using Deluge (for Deluge you gotta install Xcode and familiarised with CLI and how it works)

Azureus is a RAM hogger.

yea man.. azureus hogs too much RAM.
transmission is nice but, no encryption. waiting for an update to have it

But I think that is not free, right ? The free one only limit max 10kbs download.

However, none of the Mac BT client I tried manage to bypass Streamyx throttle policy. I am using Deluge for Linux in VMWare.

You guys will need to subscribe to a VPN or Seedbox service. BT is officially dead with Streamyx.

can you tell us more about the VPN and Seedbox service?