Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD/ATI R680 - Dual GPU Graphic Card, review - The return of the King

views
     
skylinegtr34rule4life
post Jan 31 2008, 09:12 AM

13k elite :P
********
Senior Member
13,340 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: back from vacation XD



shoo shoo get the fc outta here and bring your NVIDIA-ism outta the dark side u fcer mad.gif vmad.gif

QUOTE(general_odin @ Jan 30 2008, 10:22 PM)
Hey guys...
GeForce 9600 game out already....

benchmark from some website stated that 2 GeForce 9600GT SLi can defeat GeForce 8800 Ultra

nice...
nVIDIA ROX !!!
*
This post has been edited by skylinegtr34rule4life: Jan 31 2008, 09:16 AM
SSJBen
post Jan 31 2008, 09:14 AM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(ccm @ Jan 31 2008, 01:34 AM)
hi..correct me if i am wrong
one thing unconfirm..this card supports pcie 2.0 and pcie x16..
but the bridge on the ( the bridge that connects two chips together on a PCB )card is only supports pcie x16 so even though if connect this card on a pcie2.0 board, it wont give u the benefits on pcie2.0....

read from a chinese site, if you put a pcie1.1 card on a pcie2.0 mobo, the performance will run better than the 1.1 one..
somehow rather if putting this card in a pcie2.0 mobo still can perform better than the pcie1.1..but it wont work on pcie2.0, it'd only recognized as pcie1.1

now the 3870x2 is 800/1800 or 825/1800 or 850/1800 by fan cooling..
read from fudzilla there is a water cooling coming on next week, one of those can hit over 900+/2000
source that tells this card will lose all the benefits from pcie2.0
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=c...d=5356&Itemid=1
*
Jeez it doesn't even matter. PCI-E 2.0 as of now only provides 1-3FPS performance difference from PCI-E 1.x.

kianweic
post Jan 31 2008, 09:17 AM

Work hard, play hard.
*******
Senior Member
3,809 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Jakarta


Looks like competition from AMD/ATI is heating up. Great to see some interesting stuff happening on AMD/ATI side. I never knew Radeon 3870x2 was in development.

Generally, I like AMD/ATI Radeon cards in terms of graphics, I used to own a Radeon 9800 Pro. How is the AMD/ATI drivers these days?

After that I went for Nvidia 7 series and now Geforce 8800GT. Is this card considered high end like the Geforce 8800GTS and Geforce 8800GTX in terms of pricing? Graphic cards industry sure move too fast to follow.
Ezonizs
post Jan 31 2008, 09:18 AM

~*~Freak~*~
******
Senior Member
1,055 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(general_odin @ Jan 30 2008, 11:22 PM)
Hey guys...
GeForce 9600 game out already....

benchmark from some website stated that 2 GeForce 9600GT SLi can defeat GeForce 8800 Ultra

nice...
nVIDIA ROX !!!
*
oh my lol doh.gif shuuuuu shuuuu laugh.gif
Nocrimes
post Jan 31 2008, 09:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
160 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(general_odin @ Jan 30 2008, 10:22 PM)
Hey guys...
GeForce 9600 game out already....

benchmark from some website stated that 2 GeForce 9600GT SLi can defeat GeForce 8800 Ultra

nice...
nVIDIA ROX !!!
*
You see they are trying desperate move doh.gif
rclxub.gif

They got what they deserve anyway, the truth always come out, NV ADA S#@$**@ Point, it is only for those who know nothing with big pocket.

Back to the topic please, no time for them. whistling.gif

Any Other shops in LYT have it???? icon_rolleyes.gif

onimusha333
post Jan 31 2008, 11:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
169 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Kepong, KL



QUOTE(Nocrimes @ Jan 31 2008, 09:53 AM)
You see they are trying desperate move doh.gif 
rclxub.gif

They got what they deserve anyway, the truth always come out, NV ADA  S#@$**@ Point, it is only for those who know nothing with big pocket.

Back to the topic please, no time for them. whistling.gif

Any Other shops in LYT have it???? icon_rolleyes.gif
*
heard from senoir here that Loywat c-zone hav it,
for RM1550... u wanna get 1? drool.gif icon_idea.gif icon_idea.gif
cstkl1
post Jan 31 2008, 11:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jan 31 2008, 09:14 AM)
Jeez it doesn't even matter. PCI-E 2.0 as of now only provides 1-3FPS performance difference from PCI-E 1.x.
*
This is from what u read...good googling.. thumbup.gif

reality from those who tested it.

pcie 2.0 spec can overclock higher
and is independent from ure PCI/sata mhz...
been running them at 120mhz.. for a long time...

pcie sig 1.1 is not.. and will still be locked with sata/pci slots.

and its around 3-5 percent on same clocks but get higher clocks later on. slightly especially on mem.

fps increase is depending on 3 factors

Reso ure running
MB/GB ure GPU has
Bus/Mem speed on Bandwidth..

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 31 2008, 12:20 PM
ccm
post Jan 31 2008, 12:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
669 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: From Cheras Currently @ Kota Kinabalu


QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jan 31 2008, 09:14 AM)
Jeez it doesn't even matter. PCI-E 2.0 as of now only provides 1-3FPS performance difference from PCI-E 1.x.
*
a pcie2.0 card installed on a pcie1.1 and pcie 2.0 mobo, i think the different is definitely more than 1~3fps performance..
but a pcie1.1 card installed on a pcie1.1 mobo and pcie2.0 mobo, this can be 1~3fps increase when u install on a pcie2 mobo..
cstkl1
post Jan 31 2008, 12:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(ccm @ Jan 31 2008, 12:07 PM)
a pcie2.0 card installed on a pcie1.1 and pcie 2.0 mobo, i think the different is definitely more than 1~3fps performance..
but a pcie1.1 card installed on a pcie1.1 mobo and pcie2.0 mobo, this can be 1~3fps increase when u install on a pcie2 mobo..
*
dude the difference again is based on
the three things above..

hence

example
joker A.
with HD3850 256mb
on maximus or foxconn p35 mars..
gaming at 1440x900..
no diff..

joker B
with HD3870 512mb OCed Mems to 1250.
on same boards above
gaming at 1920x1200 ..
mainly on "FPS games" which uses a lot of MB's on ure gpu to load all that background and environment.

has up to 5 percent difference..

1-3fps??.. what game ..
3fps more in crysis means 10 percent jump..

so use percentage.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 31 2008, 12:24 PM
ccm
post Jan 31 2008, 12:33 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
669 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: From Cheras Currently @ Kota Kinabalu


ya..i think the fps drive me confuse.. the percentage will be much easier to understand..thx
SSJBen
post Jan 31 2008, 02:43 PM

Stars deez nuts.
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Jan 31 2008, 11:57 AM)
This is from what u read...good googling.. thumbup.gif

reality from those who tested it.

pcie 2.0 spec can overclock higher
and is independent from ure PCI/sata  mhz...
been running them at 120mhz.. for a long time...

pcie sig 1.1 is not.. and will still be locked with sata/pci slots.

and its around 3-5 percent on same clocks but get higher clocks later on. slightly especially on mem.

fps increase is depending on 3 factors

Reso ure running
MB/GB ure GPU has
Bus/Mem speed on Bandwidth..
*
Probably take a look at this: http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/01/23/cro...ress/page5.html

While Tomshardware charts are a little bit... skeptical, but the thing is what I'm trying to pin-point is that running on a X38 board/any board with PCI-E 2.0 doesn't really give much of a performance increase.

I think I would have to rephrase that 1-3FPS performance increase is somewhat wrong, something within the point of 1%-3% increament in performance in most games is more precise. As you set, this will depend on what game but I'm simply taking the average here.

True that later on graphic cards will take the full benifit of the double bandwidth on PCI-E 2.0, but right now, not yet. Not atleast enough to warrant a purchase for a X38 mobo or 780i if you aren't doing multi-GPU setups.

S4PH
post Jan 31 2008, 02:49 PM

adam_s4ph
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: ..Tsukuba..


nt many games support crossfire yet and the 2nd GPU will nt b used if the game does nt support crossfire/the drivers are nt up to date,check guru3d.com 3870x2 is nt compatible with world in conflict.ATI need 2 improve their drivers.88GT SLI beats the crap outa 3870x2 even in crysis.
cstkl1
post Jan 31 2008, 04:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
6,799 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jan 31 2008, 02:43 PM)
Probably take a look at this: http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/01/23/cro...ress/page5.html

While Tomshardware charts are a little bit... skeptical, but the thing is what I'm trying to pin-point is that running on a X38 board/any board with PCI-E 2.0 doesn't really give much of a performance increase.

I think I would have to rephrase that 1-3FPS performance increase is somewhat wrong, something within the point of 1%-3% increament in performance in most games is more precise. As you set, this will depend on what game but I'm simply taking the average here.

True that later on graphic cards will take the full benifit of the double bandwidth on PCI-E 2.0, but right now, not yet. Not atleast enough to warrant a purchase for a X38 mobo or 780i if you aren't doing multi-GPU setups.
*
correcto mundo..

oh yeah and that review is inconclusive..
they should try higher bus on rams/ ddr3 higher speeds etc...
willing to be there is a difference.

as i had said 3 factors..


no single card solution takes up that bandwidth..
i am still figuring out ..
does the latency between the two GPU of the HD3870x2 makes up for the slower GDDR3 compared to HD3870 Crossfire ..

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jan 31 2008, 04:14 PM
S4PH
post Jan 31 2008, 05:13 PM

adam_s4ph
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: ..Tsukuba..


ur rite,faster bus and faster ram needs to be used to fully optimise the dual gpu configuration,meaning the 3870x2 power nt full unleashed if use phenom platform with hypertransport3 .But they should just make 2 cores on the gpu instead of making 2 gpu on 1 card just what 3dfx did b4 with their voodoo 5 up to 4 GPU on 1 card crazy!!!!!!,resulting more heat and power consumption.The power consumption of 3870x2 almost same as 2900XT bro its super duper power hungry card and if u c in the benchmark at lower resolution 3870x2 going through cpu bottleneck,showing that the bus speed is nt enough.
ATi_FANBOY
post Jan 31 2008, 08:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
181 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: inside ur CPU L2 cache



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this card is a pcie 1.1 part. so far, only HIS misprinted the box cover with pcie 2.0.
tkh_1001
post Jan 31 2008, 09:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



QUOTE(ATi_FANBOY @ Jan 31 2008, 08:07 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


this card is a pcie 1.1 part. so far, only HIS misprinted the box cover with pcie 2.0.
*
blink.gif blink.gif
TSnagflar
post Feb 1 2008, 11:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,813 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
From: Lower Perak


few day already still no llyn member buy this monster ???
Ezonizs
post Feb 1 2008, 12:41 PM

~*~Freak~*~
******
Senior Member
1,055 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(nagflar @ Feb 1 2008, 12:02 PM)
few day already still no llyn member buy this monster ???
*
bcs performance of this monster card is dissapointing due to its DRIVERS havent mature vmad.gif
AMDAthlon
post Feb 1 2008, 12:51 PM

The future is Fusion
*******
Senior Member
5,221 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Deneb star


yeah..need to wait offical driver released and i am sure some of here will grab it.
skylinegtr34rule4life
post Feb 1 2008, 08:35 PM

13k elite :P
********
Senior Member
13,340 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: back from vacation XD



QUOTE(nagflar @ Feb 1 2008, 11:02 AM)
few day already still no llyn member buy this monster ???
*
monster need 2 drink more milk 2 grow up aka more stable drivers laugh.gif tongue.gif

27 Pages « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0239sec    0.61    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 01:46 PM