QUOTE(tadasu @ Jul 23 2008, 06:41 PM)
i agree. personally i think most of the photos not that realistic, and the colours are overly-saturated in some. but if that's what u want to achieve, then by all means

. i myself prefer more subtle HDR, which reveals the details as much as possible while maintaining a realistic feel to it.
yeah, thats what i meant... subtle effects... HDR that doesn't stand out... that the beauty in subtle HDR
so when someone look at the photo's they can't tell its been HDR'ed...
purpose of HDR is to reduce shadows in images, so u take photo's with blown out exposure to capture details in shadow, and combine it with the normal parts with good details in proper exposure...
correct me if i'm wrong...
Added on July 24, 2008, 6:13 pmQUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 23 2008, 01:10 AM)
for night shot, ofcourse i used tripod one... 25 sec... 30 sec.. its normal...

Added on July 23, 2008, 1:11 amonly if the sky is great with nice clouds... if just plain... nothing special...

Added on July 23, 2008, 1:12 amso u think my photos not realistic?

try browsing others in lowyat... how they do their hdr...

i agree with you, i've seen other's worse HDR's b4...
i suspect the software that you are using for combine the exposure's not doing a good job, try different software...
Added on July 24, 2008, 6:16 pmQUOTE(razuryza @ Jul 16 2008, 04:28 PM)
Part III#246

#247

#248

#249

#250

take number #250 for example, its perfect... HDR photo that doesn't shout out "I'm HDR'ed"
the problem is when the HDR software or the values that u use try to reduce the shadows caused by the coconut trees... , its impossible and will cause problems in other parts of the photos...
This post has been edited by jananan: Jul 24 2008, 06:16 PM