Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Rejuvenating LYN WoW Forums

views
     
loafer
post Dec 12 2007, 04:35 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Dec 12 2007, 02:15 PM)
talk about human advancement in sexual activities? (well, we kinda suck in that, TBH.)
*
Actually I find that statement semi-true at best. You'll realize that that the current generation of female party-goers are getting more and more sexually liberated as opposed to say maybe 10 years ago. Of course we're no where near how open the American women can be but the ladies in Malaysia is definitely heading in the right direction smile.gif

I can't say the same for the male counter-parts, perhaps a female party-goer can enlighten us with her observations?
loafer
post Dec 12 2007, 04:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Dec 12 2007, 02:17 PM)
seconded this.


Added on December 12, 2007, 2:34 pm

ill take that as a compliment and give my thanks.

but started by whom isnt really the matter, if anything i played a major role in the flame fest too smile.gif

despite that, do you think the thread would lived through page 8 without random spams here and there and massive derailments if it werent for the flamefest? i personally dont. but who knows? smile.gif
*
The questions of who, what, where and when isn't really much of an issue here. I believe major epeening threads which merely stroke ones ego will always be target for flamers and the likes. This is akin to the argument of post counts ages ago which goes something like "Oh look you have 1 post and I have 3004002 posts. This means my package is longer, thicker and squirts farther than yours". If everyone starts a forum thread with the word "Constructive" in their mind I think we will be more happy people.

As far as educating people on how not to be a flamer, I would think that we Malaysians are smart enough to already know. The only thing I suspect we Malaysians lack is the ability to see past criticism and sarcasm.


Added on December 12, 2007, 5:01 pm
QUOTE(myremi @ Dec 12 2007, 04:40 PM)
An ex-female party-goer view : Actually, 10 years ago, ladies were already sexually active. Just not so open about it but that's only because communication today is better "network" with mobile phones and internet. biggrin.gif

I can say more but it risks getting this thread lock.
*
What I'm trying to say is, women these days are more aware of their sexuality and getting less inhibited with it. This in turn leads to the notion that Love=Sex being totally dropped.

Don't get me wrong here, I totally agree that women have been sexually active 10 years ago and more definitely. What I'm merely stating is that the current mindset of women when it comes to sex is different from what you would find in a women 10 years ago.

This post has been edited by loafer: Dec 13 2007, 02:07 AM
loafer
post Dec 12 2007, 07:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Dec 12 2007, 05:21 PM)
Actually, i wouldnt agree on the example of:

try imagining some new forumer comes in, with 0 post count, flaming some old skool forumer that has 3004002 post counts (provided they are legit non-spammed posts), in a 3rd person's view, most likely you're going to take the one with the most post count when it comes to post credibility. of course, this is always subjected to the thread topic/contents, the posts being posted by both sides, and of course the contents of the flame posts. But you get the idea that YES, it CAN actually give a benchmark on one's credibility, so indirectly yes, said poster with 3004002 post would prolly have a package thats longer, thicker, and squirts further.
*
Of course, that's assuming that we're talking about flamers and people who doesn't know what they're talking or debating about. You must realize not everyone flames a thread for the sake of trolling or posting random crap. There has been lots of credible debates out there only to have one's thought cut off just because you decided to be a casual reader rather than an opinionated reader. Not everyone with 30004010 posts know what they're talking about.

So like I mentioned earlier, being constructive and being able to see past sarcasm and criticism would probably be one of the better ways to "rejuvenate" the WoW forums.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0156sec    0.43    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 02:30 AM