QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Dec 12 2007, 02:17 PM)
seconded this.
Added on December 12, 2007, 2:34 pmill take that as a compliment and give my thanks.
but started by whom isnt really the matter, if anything i played a major role in the flame fest too

despite that, do you think the thread would lived through page 8 without random spams here and there and massive derailments if it werent for the flamefest? i personally dont. but who knows?

The questions of who, what, where and when isn't really much of an issue here. I believe major epeening threads which merely stroke ones ego will always be target for flamers and the likes. This is akin to the argument of post counts ages ago which goes something like "Oh look you have 1 post and I have 3004002 posts. This means my package is longer, thicker and squirts farther than yours". If everyone starts a forum thread with the word "Constructive" in their mind I think we will be more happy people.
As far as educating people on how not to be a flamer, I would think that we Malaysians are smart enough to already know. The only thing I suspect we Malaysians lack is the ability to see past criticism and sarcasm.
Added on December 12, 2007, 5:01 pmQUOTE(myremi @ Dec 12 2007, 04:40 PM)
An ex-female party-goer view : Actually, 10 years ago, ladies were already sexually active. Just not so open about it but that's only because communication today is better "network" with mobile phones and internet.

I can say more but it risks getting this thread lock.
What I'm trying to say is, women these days are more aware of their sexuality and getting less inhibited with it. This in turn leads to the notion that Love=Sex being totally dropped.
Don't get me wrong here, I totally agree that women have been sexually active 10 years ago and more definitely. What I'm merely stating is that the current mindset of women when it comes to sex is different from what you would find in a women 10 years ago.
This post has been edited by loafer: Dec 13 2007, 02:07 AM