QUOTE(vintec @ Dec 13 2007, 11:51 AM)
so ibanez is the one to choose? in terms of performance, value and realiability. have to say bye-bye to that yellow natural satin of pacifica
everyone agree that? sebulat-bulat suara?
bro...if you observe this thread properly...
majority voting for pacificas ...
and..pacifica have my vote too , since you are getting 112 , with alder body...
firstly, yamaha pickups are better than ibanez's stock muddy pickups..
second..believe me ...yamaha pacifica 112's alder body isn't the cheap china mahogany that GSA uses...not to mention yamaha pacifica has wayyy more color options..
third..
fvck the resale value ...a bash up GSA cannot sell higher than a mint pacifica..
my point is ...the brand is not the only thing that affects the resale value ..
i would think that a yamaha with a seymour duncan JB combination will look more attractive for me than a GSA with seymour duncans combination..
and...this 2 guitars is still at a low end range..so the resale value difference is what?50 bugs ? 30 bugs ? no feel...
i admit that Ibanez has a better reliability ..the new pacificas has the pickup selector problem...
but in terms of looks ...(honestly ..you will look quite bad with IBANEZ GIO ..if you are using yamaha pacificas , u can always say JD from pop shuvit uses it..haha )
performance and value , i will give it to yamaha.
but hey , if you manage to push up your budget..to a real ibanez SA vs yamaha pacifica 112 ..then i would say SA..hands down
Dec 13 2007, 12:22 PM

Quote
0.0201sec
0.35
5 queries
GZIP Disabled