QUOTE(expantyhoesthief @ Jan 2 2008, 03:32 AM)
*replying for the high-lighted sentence above*
FYI, you can take any charges you want and even sue him but at the end of the day HE can just DENY the transactions and court will free him coz lack of evidence
Y not just wait for the refund[which i assume will take a long time from the amount invloved] instead of making things worst
DOnt forget you dont have BLACK and WHITE DOCUMENTS to SUE HIM or take any charges on HIM LEgally - this is standard evidence needed
just my 2cents or advice *have no intention to offend anyone*
I beg to differ. You do not need 'black and white documents' to sue someone. As long as you can show a contract has been formed and broken, it is sufficient. The thread in LYN is where he offered his goods on the terms and conditions listed. By paying him the money, you are accepting his offer. You can proof this by showing your banking in slip. As the goods were not delivered, the contract has been broken and you have recourse in the courts of law. It is akin to buying your goods at a grocery store - there is no 'black and white documents' but it is perfectly valid.FYI, you can take any charges you want and even sue him but at the end of the day HE can just DENY the transactions and court will free him coz lack of evidence
Y not just wait for the refund[which i assume will take a long time from the amount invloved] instead of making things worst
DOnt forget you dont have BLACK and WHITE DOCUMENTS to SUE HIM or take any charges on HIM LEgally - this is standard evidence needed
just my 2cents or advice *have no intention to offend anyone*
However, suing someone for a meager amount of money is silly and a waste of the court's time.
Jan 3 2008, 06:12 PM
Quote
0.0305sec
0.26
7 queries
GZIP Disabled