Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies TRANSFORMERS 2., MEGAN FOX :)

views
     
Snake'eyes
post Aug 13 2008, 01:06 PM

Silent Shinobi
******
Senior Member
1,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



wanna know why they choose Bay for the directing transfomers movie?
Coz first of all, there's no Director can direct a better action cars movie then Bay....he's the best in terms of car stunts.

Also Bay's movies has the best Lighting base for Metallic colors in terms for cars/planes/ships any vehicle u name it. From CGI to Real-time lighting realistic effects compare to George Lucas's Star Wars which obviously u can tell its CGI.
The Lighting in Star wars wasnt convicing that its real.

In shorter terms, His movies effects Looks the most realistic coz of the Lighting requirement Bay has for his movies. And Special Effects also is the most expensive cost for a movie.

So imagine US151million budget for 10 Transfomers(with Special Effects like bombs/transformatation/anything cant be done on real live stunt) in the movie with US300plus on Spiderman 3.

I say Spiderman was Rip off with lousy special effects that ain't realistic or convincing compare with 10 transfomers in the movie.

Just like THe first Hulk Movie...lousy lighting make Hulk look aint real compare to the new Hulk movie.


Snake'eyes
post Sep 4 2008, 03:16 PM

Silent Shinobi
******
Senior Member
1,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(alpha0201 @ Sep 3 2008, 02:46 PM)
Dude...the people whom done the cgi & special effects (Industrial Light & Magic) for the Transformers owned by George Lucas.
*
So what its own by George Lucas? Its not who owned the company who did it, its who directed the movie. The Director is the one who Directs how a movie show run, how its gonna convince as realistic as he wants in the movie for the CGI work not the Company.

QUOTE
Bay, who has directed numerous car commercials, understood ray tracing was the key to making the robots look real; the CG models would look realistic based on how much of the environment was reflecting on their bodies.Numerous simulations were programmed into the robots, so the animators could focus on animating the particular areas needed for a convincing performance.


Plus Industrial Light & Magic Didnt did all the work alone.....Last Segment was of the movie was done by Digital Domain.

This post has been edited by Snake'eyes: Sep 4 2008, 03:19 PM
Snake'eyes
post Sep 5 2008, 02:59 PM

Silent Shinobi
******
Senior Member
1,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(alpha0201 @ Sep 5 2008, 09:57 AM)
Bad Boys 2 directed by Bay and the car chase scene CGI was bad & it wasn't done by ILM.

There are a loooooooong list of movie in special effects dept done by ILM which aren't directed by Bay.

ie. Ironman, Harry Potter Series, Pirates of the Carribean series, Jurassic Park, Titanic, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Terminator 2 & 3, etc... they are groundbreaking
*
Guess u just ignore this quote below huh?
QUOTE
Bay, who has directed numerous car commercials, understood ray tracing was the key to making the robots look real; the CG models would look realistic based on how much of the environment was reflecting on their bodies.Numerous simulations were programmed into the robots, so the animators could focus on animating the particular areas needed for a convincing performance.


You just explain why Bad Boys 2 car chase scene CGI was bad COZ it wasnt done by ILM. So no need futher explanations on that. doh.gif

Oh did I say anything about ILM only works in Bay's movies?
And did I mention anything about those movies arent groundbreaking with thier CGIs?
Or Did I say anything about ILM been a cheap/lousy Visual Effects CGI company?

The answer is NO to all, sweat.gif
In fact ILM is one of the few earliest visual effects successful companies in the early 70s which has received 16 Best Visual Effects Oscars and 20 additional nominations. It had also received 22 technical Oscars as of till 2006.

Oops maybe u also forgot That Bay dislike using CGI visual effects in his movies, and will shoot his film using as less possible as he could.
Snake'eyes
post Feb 17 2009, 06:00 PM

Silent Shinobi
******
Senior Member
1,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



is it just mean but the constructicons design of the Devastoter suck?
Snake'eyes
post Feb 23 2009, 03:15 PM

Silent Shinobi
******
Senior Member
1,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



QUOTE(rhoyo @ Feb 23 2009, 02:46 PM)
man that is so nerd .  laugh.gif
*
ya agreed...the nerdest thing I ever read since page 33. Just enjoy the explosives LOL thumbup.gif
Snake'eyes
post Feb 23 2009, 08:29 PM

Silent Shinobi
******
Senior Member
1,224 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Why so serious? Bay enjoys Dynamites Gunpowder and Gasoline. thumbup.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0178sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 11:32 PM