QUOTE(zio @ May 27 2008, 04:46 PM)
fixed QUOTE(soulfly @ May 27 2008, 04:48 PM)
thanks!Edinor Yaziz Photography, Anas & Nurain
|
|
May 27 2008, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#201
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2008, 05:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#202
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ May 27 2008, 04:55 PM) loved the shots in general. great composition and color. The wall, i want to try a composition that looks like someone is peeping through» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i think if you have UWA lens, it'll add to the list of great photos. keep up the good work! the door and see whats the fuss inside the bride's room. Alrite, the headless shots. that one was really really really on purpose. I tried 3 shots to get that, seems like i got too many ( almost identical ) shots with the heads on there's more to it Right side? Thanks goldfries. whats a UWA? QUOTE(zio @ May 27 2008, 04:56 PM) Ahh, now i can comment. Very nice and I am sure the couple will be happy. i answered that on goldfries My only gripe is with Part 1 - Pic 6 because I don't get it. The mics were largely uninteresting and since you chopped off the facial expression, I am not sure what to interpret from that. And Part 3 - Pic 2 because the silhoutte because it is not a clean silhoutte. The light from the window revealed a bit of details on the face. Lol thats my 2 cents maybe its just me, i liked that photo very much. yeah, i was in a dilemma whether to make it a clean silhoutte or lose some and add some facial features, its like im trying to catch the lights on the bride's face. Thanks Zio! sorry i cant take you with me to the wedding This post has been edited by MR.Shiney: May 27 2008, 05:07 PM |
|
|
May 27 2008, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#203
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(goldfries @ May 27 2008, 05:21 PM) don't worry, as photographers - we're also people. our shots show what we like, not a representation of others. gotcha! UWA - ultra wide angle. owh, only if everything is free i have to utilize what i got for now. UWA is pretty far to go. QUOTE(soulfly @ May 27 2008, 05:21 PM) if the price is right, you'll receive my order. kekeke |
|
|
May 27 2008, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#204
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(orenzai @ May 27 2008, 08:25 PM) part 1 part 12. cant see the bride's face... 3. the wall is too distracting...as goldfries said, it looks flawed 5. the face took up too much space(approx 1/3 of the image) 6. the face chopped off O.o cant find the subject part 2 1. its nice but i think your exposure a lil bit on the bright side.. 2. i like this one 8 an 9 nice part 3 1. OOF i think, you focused on the brides tudung instead of the groom's eyes 2. the brides tudungs jewellery looks like dead pixels 3. very nice compo...maybe can adjust the curve a bit so that the picture can be more punchy? 5 and 6 ps: these are just MO, 2. Im trying to show the kid's curiousity. it doesnt mean you have to follow every rule, is it? if you're keep doing it the right way, for me its going to be a common picture like the rest of wedding photos. i dont need to show their faces ( sometimes ), because they already know who is it when they got their album. i hope you know what i mean part 3 1. yes i noticed that 2. lol, i didnt noticed that until you mentioned it 3. is this more personal preferences or ... ? because it seems fine from here 4. that's called acting hehehe, no sweat bro. you can come and criticize my photos any day thanks! This post has been edited by MR.Shiney: May 27 2008, 08:47 PM |
|
|
May 27 2008, 09:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#205
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
May 27 2008, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#206
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(orenzai @ May 27 2008, 09:09 PM) O.o thats bad news. 7.1mp is barely just enough for an A4 print... at least go up to 10mp safer mar hmm Added on May 27, 2008, 9:10 pmerm..maybe its enough lar...but why buy a 14mp camera if you jsut wanna use 7.1mp? use back your d40!! Soon.. soon This post has been edited by MR.Shiney: May 27 2008, 09:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 28 2008, 01:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#207
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
May 28 2008, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#208
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(azmihamzah @ May 28 2008, 12:26 PM) interested in your work. Can you cover Batu Pahat area? Thanks Added on May 28, 2008, 12:28 pmThe pelamin really look so familiar omg, and the dress too. Maybe same mak andam, or was it pak andam btw, bro Kuala Lipis is in Pahang la. HAHAHA! Johor?! what was i thinking? Batu Pahat? Honestly, i dont know where is that. If they can pick me up at any KTM or LRT station then i can Really? the mak andam is the beside the little girl in Part 1 number 3. This post has been edited by MR.Shiney: May 28 2008, 01:35 PM |
|
|
May 28 2008, 01:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#209
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
May 28 2008, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#210
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
May 30 2008, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#211
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(Mavik @ May 29 2008, 06:03 PM) Ahhh Mavik, im glad you're here owkay, 1) I admit, i focused it wrongly. i cant get the focus right because the girl start to noticed when i was going for a second try. so i guess i post this one as my best catch. 6) This is the part where he said " saya blablabla <insert name> RM200 etc etc" i think it'll better if i caught him with his mouth was opened. 8) seriously, i dont know. All i know just shoot 4) i guess not 5) i think crop wont work for this one, its my mistake for leaving too much space above the couple. Thanks Mavik, i really appreciate the comments |
|
|
May 31 2008, 11:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#212
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Coming Soon ![]() |
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#213
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Freeze Today i just finished my wedding shoot at Bangi, after that a friend of mine ask me out to The Curve and i shot this. No post processing was done with all three shots. ![]() ![]() ![]() true sony colors! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#214
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(168257061 @ Jun 2 2008, 08:44 AM) Camera: Sony DSLR-A350Exposure: 0.01 sec (1/100) Aperture: f/5.6 Focal Length: 70 mm ISO Speed: 800 Exposure Bias: 0/10 EV Flash: Flash fired here it is QUOTE(jsc_tidus @ Jun 2 2008, 01:16 PM) that is YOUR preference. can show me yours?to think of slowing down the shutter, the water will be blurry and i cant see the fountain texture. |
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#215
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(vikingw2k @ Jun 2 2008, 02:19 PM) he is clear, he said use slower shutter for more dreamier effect. and i dont like people calling themselves a noob! they can do much more, if they're willing to. |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 02:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#216
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 05:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#217
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Before and After ![]() I was bored and dug up my old wedding photos, here's the before and after edit. |
|
|
Jun 15 2008, 03:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#218
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(orenzai @ Jun 15 2008, 12:14 PM) hello there, fixed bold for the droplet shots.. i like the freezing droplets but somehow the gold plated background is distracting me..i am having a hard time to focus on the droplets as the golden shiny background is distracting me... just MO for that wedding shot, i suggest you try to not clip the highlights too much lor... its a lil too saturated for me... i prefer if the shot was just a WB tweak to make it warmer coz the shot perfectly fine to me okay, wedding shots. Its not what i've done right, but to look good. Its not about sharpness, colors, and details at all. Although i did try to loose details at minimum. If you noticed i did some Gaussian blurry effect to give it a glow effect. Im trying to make it even better. |
|
|
Jun 15 2008, 08:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#219
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(orenzai @ Jun 15 2008, 07:42 PM) |
|
|
Jun 21 2008, 02:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#220
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,843 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Can you smell what my mom is cooking? ![]() |
| Change to: | 0.0377sec
0.16
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 02:51 AM |