Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Nokia N95 8GB VS N82, Which one is better??
|
Find The Way
|
Dec 15 2007, 12:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Seaedge @ Dec 10 2007, 01:17 PM) i would say n95 would be a better bet. 8gb and stylish formfactor make it hard to resist. and from n82 design, i would be happily put 8gb into my list rather than n82. and n82 felt abit plastic-ky. When I hold N82 and play around with it, I don't think it is that plastic actually (though had read many posts with the same complain  ). Of course, for sure it is neither as metallic as models like 6500 classic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Find The Way
|
Dec 22 2007, 08:05 AM
|
|
Damn, few weeks ago read few reviews that compares N82 with N95 8GB, all of them telling N82 last longer usage although its battery capacity is slightly less than N95 8GB. However just visited Nokia website, which telling that N95 8GB last longer than N82. Which sources should I trust???  Any tips?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Find The Way
|
Dec 22 2007, 11:03 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Naked-Snake @ Dec 22 2007, 09:24 AM) actually its the same. depend on the user how the used it. i thot that n95 8gb more longer compared to n82 with xenonflash cauz xflash use a lot of battery? i think?  That's the part i'm confusing abt... I was searching reviews that is more focusing on camera features. I remember one of the review was telling that, they tested the camera features with the same settings and env (of course except N82 with xenon flash) and found N95 8GB running out of battery much faster than N82, whereby N82 was able to shoot more pictures yet last longer  , and concluded this is due to larger screen of N95 8GB. The only two reasons for me to consider N82 are better photo quality and lasting longer usage.
|
|
|
|
|