Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Phenom x3 and x4 now in Malaysia, The new K10
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 20 2007, 11:35 AM
|
|
Truly a BIG BIG dissapointment from AMD!!! They've been boasting their performance for like a year now.. What 40% better than Intel!! hahaha I was thinking it could b better a little than the current Intel products on market.. gosh was I WRONG. All empty gas from the AMD pretenders Penryn is gonna smoke this Phenom(menon failure!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 20 2007, 01:34 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Nov 20 2007, 01:06 PM) I don't recall any of such claim. Link? http://www.amd.com/us-en/Corporate/Virtual...~117115,00.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 20 2007, 06:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jonuslee @ Nov 20 2007, 05:42 PM) Dunno when will AMD beat Intel again???Really hope that AMD can come out best processor to beat Intel!!Waiting for that moment to come!!  Have to wait very loong. the Chipzilla has awoken after a kick by AMD with their AMD64. Intel is no longer the old sluggish company. They are restructuring themselves to be more efficient and pushing themselves to the limit to compete in this cut throat business. The boom of the late 90's has made Intel proud n lazy n complacent but not now. U think AMD is the first with integrated memory controller or CSI?? Intel have similar plans long time ago, just some bad management and foresight failed them. Intel is now in the lead and they wont let go of it so easily now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 20 2007, 10:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(chimera @ Nov 20 2007, 07:31 PM) i think phenom will be a better buy coz of its backward as well as future compatible platform. looking at intel roadmap...the next gen quad proc QX9770 wont be compatible with its X38 chipset. u'll hv to upgrade ur mobo to X48 to get this proc running. whereas phenom is compatible with 939, AM and AM+ platform....granted the performance is not on par with intel Q6600...but it presents the best value for money for those who wants to run quad processors on the budget...checkout tomshardware review of phenom on the links below... tomshardware phenomjust offering my 2 cents...  yup... tomshardware has better thought of AMD Anandtech's Phenom reviewanandtech however, think phenom is all doom and gloom
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 20 2007, 10:30 PM
|
|
AMD wont go bankrupt one. The OEM and ODM wont want to see a scenario where Intel is the only player on the market. The worst is we see AMD being taken over by another investment group or large company.
AMD has been losing money for years before Athlon and AMD64 comes along
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 26 2007, 04:46 PM
|
|
Found a bit of interesting news on Tom's hardware Phenom review Tom's Phenom review & conclusion -- wrong?Is Tom's H a AMD fanboy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 30 2007, 09:22 AM
|
|
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 29 2007, 03:30 PM) [SIZE=1] I don't think it has anything to do with the clock speeds, actually. It's probably one of the errata mentioned here, 248. http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_ty..._docs/41322.pdfLooks like it only affects virtualization. Mind to explain more? The description is pretty vague. Under a highly specific and detailed set of conditions, an internal resource livelock may occur between a TLB reload and other cached operations.I don't see how this can affect virtualization? Unless u got some info that we dont? And the performance hit 5% -10% is cause by this errata? But this bug says it caused a livelock which means ur system will hang??
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 30 2007, 04:43 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 30 2007, 02:48 PM) It mentions hypervisor and guest. It's all there. I think you are looking at the wrong errata. Errata 254 suit more the official statement by AMD. "The Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) errata is an L3 protocol issue causing a system hang when running certain client workload applications independent of platform. AMD is immediately introducing an updated BIOS which will correct the TLB errata".
This problem was found during speed-binning the B2 revision processors, and this was the cause for the Phenom FX 3.0 GHz delay. It turns out that some CPUs running at 2.4 GHz or above in some benchmarking combinations, while all four cores are running at 100% load, can cause a system freeze.This bug delayed the AMD parts to Jan next year. This bug prob wont cause a performance hit but instead will cause the system to hang. It seems to me that AMD is downplaying the seriousness of this bug since it can cause the delay of higher than 2.4 Ghz speeed bin. Intel can get away with these kinda bugs with a patch update, but AMD still have to fix in a new stepping
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 30 2007, 05:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 30 2007, 04:48 PM) Is that an amd official statement?  I got it from theinquirer.net http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/new...nom-ghz-due-tlb
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Nov 30 2007, 08:42 PM
|
|
oh, so the the Inquirer is a kock of bulls eh.... HAHAAHA  So AMD is actually using microcode patch to fix the bug but with a 10% performance hit? No wonder they are pushing for a later stepping
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Dec 4 2007, 10:19 AM
|
|
Already said lo, he is a AMD fanboy. Die also die with AMD But i suspect most PC enthusiast are just neutral, we support whoever gives us the performance and bang for bucks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Dec 7 2007, 08:16 PM
|
|
AMD indeed has very poor quality control  I mean how can such a major bug escape the validation team?? This is not as serious as intel's FP bug in the 90's but at this time, AMD is just pushing itself closer to grave..  And their rock bottom share price of USD9 just shows how low the confidence the market has on AMD
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Dec 11 2007, 11:48 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Alexes @ Dec 10 2007, 05:02 PM) Got new review bout AMD phenom XH 9900: phenom 9900 in spiderQuite suprise to see Phenom also loses on the memory benchmark. Just reinforce my opinion that the Phenom is a failure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun_feng
|
Apr 9 2008, 03:47 PM
|
|
AMD stock drop after they announced the downsize of 10% of the employees.. Pity these ppl..
|
|
|
|
|