QUOTE(kennykck @ Nov 19 2007, 08:49 PM)
thats what i want to know too LoLPhenom x3 and x4 now in Malaysia, The new K10
Phenom x3 and x4 now in Malaysia, The new K10
|
|
Nov 19 2007, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19 2007, 10:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(Fields @ Nov 19 2007, 09:46 PM) and down came the rain, and washed the spider off lol, phenom can't compete with intel's quad cores. note neccesarily, for the value and mainstream consumers it is looking quite good though the CnQ II looks very promising as well, if only the price segment is good |
|
|
Nov 20 2007, 10:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
I think that the target group for amd phenom x4 is a different market then anticipated, because i feel the target groups are mainstream instead of the niche extreme performance market.
The pricing and strategy of phenom x4 is reflecting what i see. |
|
|
Nov 20 2007, 10:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(fun_feng @ Nov 20 2007, 10:30 PM) AMD wont go bankrupt one. The OEM and ODM wont want to see a scenario where Intel is the only player on the market. @ bolded partThe worst is we see AMD being taken over by another investment group or large company. AMD has been losing money for years before Athlon and AMD64 comes along Because its david vs. goliath story mar hahaha... and Athlon was the kick to the nut sacks of intel |
|
|
Nov 21 2007, 01:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(bushido_81 @ Nov 21 2007, 12:26 AM) The AMD quad is not worth it you can read the full review here http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/19/the...weaves_its_web/ Not necessarily, i suspect the market they are targeting at is to be the mainstream, so next year Q1 2008, the price would be quite competitively priced against Intels offerings As it seems even an Intel E6550/E6600 can match its performance!! |
|
|
Nov 21 2007, 03:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 21 2007, 02:51 AM) So meaning that if AMD was taken over, it would literally spell the end of AMD processors as we know it?And does that also mean that intel does not want AMD to go bust as well? Pls enlighten this noob, ikanayam |
|
|
Nov 21 2007, 03:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 21 2007, 03:15 AM) The x86 license agreement with intel has some clauses that say that intel can terminate the license if AMD goes bankrupt or gets bought over. I see, but i thought US had antitrust laws that prevent monopolization from happening? ( Microsoft excluded)Deep down inside, intel wants AMD to go bust. Else they wouldn't be pushing as hard as they are now. Of course publicly they have to say they like competition and whatnot, but intel wants to be a monopoly, if possible. And i think they see TSMC as their main competition in the future, not AMD, because unless AMD pulls off another K8 within the next year or so, i don't think they will ever fully recover from this hit. In less than a year, i think they have lost more money than they have ever made in their entire existence (certainly more than they made the last 10 years). And would you feel AMD's borrowed time is limited if they do not make another K8 miracle within the next 1 year? QUOTE(ikanayam @ Nov 21 2007, 03:21 AM) No, amd just wants to make money. They are not doing it for any other reason. Certainly there is no noble cause involved. haha yeap Same goes to intel |
|
|
Nov 21 2007, 03:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,175 posts Joined: May 2006 |
QUOTE(En.Vader @ Nov 21 2007, 03:37 AM) No, it means that no other processor maker other then intel can produce x86 if there is no AMD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86 Correct me if i am wrong |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0152sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 09:05 PM |