And people complain that the Japanese do historical revisionism in their school textbooks

/k selalu cakap solve own country punya issues first before talking about other people punya problems

Ranjit Singh Malhi, I used his reference text to study SPM sejarah last time, and got A2

Janji dapat A1 SPM in Sejarah.

To quote certain UPM professor, "sejarah tu kami punya, suka hati macam mana kami nak tulis".

south east asia was explored as a whole by british east india company, you can assume they already started to send indian labour here to develop malaysia rail roads since india has rail road earlier than us.

malaysia rail road = 1885
india rail road = 1853

History is an emotional mirror.

Some people look at it and see himself.

Some people see something they dont like and want to change it like mobile filter.

this one sound like tokok. our calender is only used in the 16th century. whr got historical record EXPLICITLY say yr 1414 during that time? some more western calendar. they mark date according to which ruler rule. eg the 6th yr of yunglo reign something like that.

You're missing the point.

Golden age of Islam is up there with other periods of ancient civilizations (Ancient Sumeria, Persia, China, Rome, Greece, European Renaissance, etc.)
that's had significant contribution to modern day science, most of what we have today can be traced back to all of the ingenuity produced during these periods.

In fact it's one of the least affected topics by historical revisionism, everybody's talking about them so there's less chance you're being a fed a bullshit version.

can already imagine person in charge who receive this wall of text just simply browse through and then see the person who wrote this.

Nons?! hahahah. wAsted my time yo. next!!

biasa la history..

when you line up accurate date and what event, some can contradict each other.

if he wrote in reign year, general public mana faham.

maybe he converted it on purpose.

most of this is a lie told by people whose only agenda is to glorify it

I saw Singapore also change their narrative

In Malaysia we kick Singapore out for being naughty

But Singapore they don't learn that. Instead they say Singapore decided to leave Federation after mutual agreement

last year me look at form 4 text book

got d-day, midway, bagration and operation Barbarossa mention
d-day landing even got map, but it so skimp for sure kids no idea what going on.

Academia around the world must be controlled by people with agenda then, kek.

it's called His Story and not HisFacts for a reason.

Prof solehah tidak setuju
Melayu 60000 tahun tidak setuju
Maybe akmal also tidak setuju

Hang tuah is a legendary hero when suit the narrative, and is missing when no longer favorable.
Parameswara or in fact any figure can be claimed as muslim for the narrative.
One can be pahlawan bugis, calling serumpun, nusantara etc, but also looking down at indonesians by calling them indogs.
mualaf like ridhuan tee, firdaus wong and vinod are heroes, when great contributor like prof chin fung kee has been mocked because ppl don't like chinese sounding road name and don't know who he is.

Will the history teach the children that malay can fly and build the largest ship etc in the future as claimed by prof solehah?

What do you get by tuning these history? So that in the grave you may claim a brownie points from god? And a slightly elevated malay superiority? When most students only know how to memorize and regurgitating? Did the author imagine someone will truly appreciate his work and enjoy the history he published? A bunch of propaganda admin butchering the historians work just to push the agenda?

This post has been edited by pandah: May 7 2026, 10:38 AM

Points #4 & #5 were what I learned as a kid in school - Parameswara didn't convert to Islam. His son did.

academia from which field 1st? even in the field of history, opinion are divided. in fact amongst community of religion, some dont agree there is such golden age. only media hype up everything