QUOTE(junky_man @ Dec 19 2025, 02:04 AM)
All good, it's a healthy conversation.
I mean, at one stage there was a supposed directive, but now putar say no directive.
So the mall operator, would be within their right, to u-turn the decision, no?
So why haven't the mall operator change back its stance to be pet friendly again?
One can assume that being a pet friendly mall is not a good business model.
Hence my earlier statement: money talks.
Its too troublesome to be embroiled in politics when the politicians themselves seem to be unsure on the laws and keep uturn on their words. So better play it safe for now and do something with the least resistance instead of keep uturn here and there making everyone confused. I mean, at one stage there was a supposed directive, but now putar say no directive.
So the mall operator, would be within their right, to u-turn the decision, no?
So why haven't the mall operator change back its stance to be pet friendly again?
One can assume that being a pet friendly mall is not a good business model.
Hence my earlier statement: money talks.
Money talks, yes. I'm sure Sunway already did their market research and saw that making it pet friendly is still lucrative. The crowds on opening week is testament to this. Also, the gang terpaling Muslim are actually a minority and most Muslim don't really mind going to that mall, also as evidenced by the malay crowd after mall opened. Most ppl who bising are those from out of state who don't even come Selangor before.
Yesterday, 10:21 AM

Quote
0.0144sec
0.75
6 queries
GZIP Disabled