Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Ramssol dilantik ejen kutipan JPJ

views
     
Redhunt
post Dec 9 2025, 05:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
Anwar gomen loves crony

if JPJ do themselves but now add nominal fee, fee goes back to raykat

if got problem can complain to MP

this one, straight go to business

if got problem, cannot complain and need to sue

so lose-lose-lose for taxpayers

who are the politicians who signed off on this ?


This post has been edited by Redhunt: Dec 9 2025, 05:07 PM
Redhunt
post Dec 9 2025, 05:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(mcchin @ Dec 9 2025, 03:58 PM)
What time your talking about here?

I have never set foot in JPJ, pos office or those UTC for more than 3 years
And yet I deal directly with JPJ on license and roadtax update
And it takes like 15 mins max each time

Deswai I dun understand this ramssol business strategy?

Who is gonna pay some fee to them when virtually everyone can do it online directly with JPJ
*
gomen say government services should be privatized to create opportunities to grow millionaires.

or to make millionaires even richer.

plus privatizing services means they escape from any responsibility.



This post has been edited by Redhunt: Dec 9 2025, 05:11 PM
Redhunt
post Dec 9 2025, 05:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(haturaya @ Dec 9 2025, 05:13 PM)
Shhhh. Don't ask. Nearly all public related project in this country is royalty related. The top most 'shareholder'.  whistling.gif
*
MPs are paid by taxpayers to ask.
Redhunt
post Dec 9 2025, 05:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(teehk_tee @ Dec 9 2025, 05:14 PM)
so whats the point of myjpj, mysikap, jpjeq, mydigital using jpj kiosk, if you're just gonna add one more app?
*
gomen already say got project on the way to combine all into one mega app

that company who is appointed to do it is not through any sort of open tender and evaluation, afaik............................. otherwise would have some noise from parliament already

This post has been edited by Redhunt: Dec 9 2025, 05:17 PM
Redhunt
post Dec 9 2025, 05:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(haturaya @ Dec 9 2025, 05:16 PM)
Nah, MPs are paid by taxpayers to protect themselves.  whistling.gif
*
for you, maybe.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0126sec    0.81    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 01:32 PM