Meanwhile for this though, I think Sarawak has done very well in comparison to many other states

1. Free tertiary public education for Sarawakians.
2. Heavily subsidized medical and treatment fees in public hospital or healthcare institutions for Sarawakians.
3. Sarawak now has a major stake in Bank, allowing pathway to fully owning a state bank.
4. Sarawak now has a port that belongs to the state.
5. Sarawak now has her own sovereign future / pension fund.
6. Sarawak now has her own airlines.
7. Sarawak also has completed majority of her infrastructure projects and more to come.

Corruption, we gotta wait for prosecution to act. But even with corruption, Sarawak has done more than states that claims to have "no corruption". Especially with the barrage of news on federal level.

Then it might be a very appealing country for non-bumi from peninsular to migrate to. Me included.

Sorry to splash cold water on your hopes

But even right now, its quite difficult to be a citizen there

Even for Sabahans

But hey not all hopes are lost, they are starting to snowball, they will need talents

If Singapore can and still demand talents - Degree holders etc

Don't see why not

lol they can try

About your Najib comments on his credits, I will be honest in saying that I cannot neutrally verify his "contributions" as of now and in an unbiased manner so I cannot agree with you entirely.

But I will give you this, there has to be at least some credit due somewhere. I will acknowledge in due time after verifying independently.

For now, as I am aware of your political standing, I cannot openly or wholeheartedly agree to your previous statements.

Thank you for pointing out though.

Actually what is wrong with abolished the immigration policy? Sarawakian can come to West Malaysia without any restrictions but when West Malaysia go Sarawak, need to have permit pulak

Just because there is this clause, do you think it's fair?

Clauses were included back in 1963 because they do not want am influx of West Malaysia to Sarawak

Today, do you think this clause is still justified?