This is me during school and college. I can mental calculated probably half of mathematical equation in SPM in head and write down the answer.

It comes naturally to me without study much. I keluar dewan after 30 minutes yet still can get 80-90 marks above in advance math.

But I'm not good in arguing and communicating so my life is okay okay only haha. My life not bad, but if someone guide in in choosing career after SPM it should be much better.

This is me during school and college. I can mental calculated probably half of mathematical equation in SPM in head and write down the answer.

It comes naturally to me without study much. I keluar dewan after 30 minutes yet still can get 80-90 marks above in advance math.

But I'm not good in arguing and communicating so my life is okay okay only haha. My life not bad, but if someone guide in in choosing career after SPM it should be much better.

Then the exam is flawed. It fails to measure real talents.

Anyone can memorize and give answers examiners want without understanding what the answer really mean and how to solve it if the problem really comes in real life.

I can just do past year questions and commonly come out questions and memorize the right answer keywords to those questions and then write them out during exams when similar questions came out.

And I have no idea why the answers are the answers and why they are correct in the first place.

That means I'm not smart at all. I have just found the way to play the game and tactics to win it.

Same as someone who can solve the rubick cube using formula vs someone who found out how to solve the cube logically through understanding

The first one can solve within minutes and perfectly but no idea what he had just spinned. The second one knows exactly why he made the move every single time to get it solved

Then the exam is flawed. It fails to measure real talents.

Anyone can memorize and give answers examiners want without understanding what the answer really mean and how to solve it if the problem really comes in real life.

I can just do past year questions and commonly come out questions and memorize the right answer keywords to those questions and then write them out during exams when similar questions came out.

And I have no idea why the answers are the answers and why they are correct in the first place.

That means I'm not smart at all. I have just found the way to play the game and tactics to win it.

Same as someone who can solve the rubick cube using formula vs someone who found out how to solve the cube logically through understanding

The first one can solve within minutes and perfectly but no idea what he had just spinned. The second one knows exactly why he made the move every single time to get it solved

Yeah exactly. Those who excel at standardized test or inspections mostly memorized or found out the tactics to write keywords to answer questions to gain marks from examiners. Not necessarily because they know how to solve the problems,or understand what they are answering.

But I still wonder, since the smart guy understand things and can think critically to solve problems, why they don't managed to answer the questions well during tests or exams. Is it because of time pressure or they don't use tactics like the correct keywords to answer questions or use their own answers that makes examiners think "you don't write what I want to see, so I can't give you marks"

If this is the case, the test is flawed. It fails to measure talent