China’s 120,000-Ton Type 004 Nuclear Supercarrier, Emerges
|
|
 Dec 4 2025, 02:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,687 posts Joined: Apr 2019 
|
wah... sure or not???? i don't know much about military stuff... but 120K ton is bigger than the Ford class rite?
what are this carrier going to carry? become Protoss carrier meh? jets and drones??? |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 4 2025, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,687 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(skywardsword @ Dec 4 2025, 02:08 PM) By the time, China, built 20 super carrier, than, maybe it can do as it please. if one believe in western media clammering about overproduction and overcapacity and over-subsidies and forced labor and unfair automation... etc... Or it bankrupt it self...  maybe 1 carrier from USA will cost same same as 5 carriers from china... then they can claim carriers from china are made from paper and wood.... hahahaha  |
|
|
Dec 4 2025, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,687 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(desmond2020 @ Dec 4 2025, 02:33 PM) uk one is state of the art UK?? hahaha...they say one lah yeah... on paper got 2, but in reality just one... like you said "one"... like the real persons, the Queen is a lot more reliable than the Price. |
|
|
Dec 4 2025, 06:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,687 posts Joined: Apr 2019
|
QUOTE(damonlbs @ Dec 4 2025, 03:29 PM) no need carrier somehow having a big arse carrier helps increase the "gravitas" of the leader.... the bigger the better.... when you have unlimited range nuclear-powered missile NATO raises alarm as Russia finalises nuclear-powered Burevestnik missile https://www.euronews.com/2025/11/16/nato-al...y-ready-for-use like old battleships/dreadnought.... |
| Change to: |  0.0121sec
 0.47
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 11:01 AM |
Quote