There is call recorder and the telco can retrieve it too.
Legal /lawful interception
Of which a variant was used to identify the IMSI tied to the device IMEI that sent an extortion message to a pastors son. A device which location update confirmed was from a place where the person who sent the message was
Modern network plus IMEI and IMSI equals slam dunk. But some ppl try to loyar buruk and said no proof he registered that number thinking it's the early 2000s
If that’s true, why did they need to fabricate the telco document? What you mentioned was never even tendered in court, so don’t act smart. They only tendered the number, name, IC, and address just “KL.” Activation date: 2014.
The accused has already made several police reports, including video evidence of a conversation with telco staff confirming that the activation date was actually 2017 proving the document was forged. Yet, no raid or arrest was carried out on the telco.
You say fabricate means fabricate? Lam Tin you want to take advantage of clerical error to escape
Repeat after me
IMSI+IMEI + Location Update = slam dunk
Your number tied to your phone from the location you actually were holds more weight la
Ppl so free work backword to forge the one evidence thats so inconsequential and not the actual telco log files topkek
Yesterday, 01:47 PM
Quote
0.0130sec
0.22
7 queries
GZIP Disabled