he wont say this if this happened to his closed family or friends.

The irony is, if extra judicial killings aren't challenged & stopped, got hi chances that his close family or frens may be the next random targets.

i not sure about the 10 charges against that lady but is it that hard to convict any of the 10 ???

Bro. You cakap must act within the law. Only black and white, no gray areas.

But, nape you pitnah and bring Ah Hock into this? Apa persamaannya? Ah Hock was being held by MACC/SPRM not PDRM.
Also, you ade proof he was executed?

Same with Koh, you got proof PDRM did it? And that he is dead?




You got proof that the voices on the audio recording are actually the victims and not voice actors or AI?


Ade? You know lar, 302. Standard of proof is high. Kalo takat insinuation, everybody can do that... 😁

And that's why we have people with 30+ criminal record roaming around at 1.40am

Too bad so sad.

I dont mind if the ratio of bad people to good people taken out stays 2:1 or better.
Besides, innocent la sangat hanging out with known scums.

U don get to decide that & practically the pulis don care oso. Bcos got precedent where pulis were convicted for offing innocent lives.

People who can't see the bigger picture won't understand. Only will once it happens to them.

not really because of can't see big picture or wont understand. I believe because of the t.

If you had lepak before past midnight at some random mamak shop believe me when I say that someone had taken a photo or 2 of you & your buddies around.

Lawyers said Melaka pulis lying about the woman, who has no cases & also new evidence from a whistleblower with photographs & timings which contradict pulis accounts of the shooting.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.malaymail....timeline/201984

lawyer not telling truth regarding criminal record, it is not only about charges / convicted in court

In Malaysia, a criminal record constitutes any official court conviction for an offence, even if a formal conviction isn't recorded (like probation or binding over), but excluding mere cautions or admonishments; it involves entries from the Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) database for serious crimes like theft, fraud, assault, or cybercrimes, impacting background checks for jobs or overseas travel, requiring consent under PDPA for employers, and leading to documents like the Certificate of Good Conduct (CGC) for international use.

What's included:
Convictions: Any finding of guilt in court, even if a formal conviction isn't entered (e.g., probation, good behaviour bonds).
Arrests & Charges: Records of arrests and pending court cases for registrable offences.
Registrable Offences: A wide range, including theft, assault, fraud, cybercrimes, kidnapping, and more serious offenses like rape or murder.

What's generally excluded (unless serious):
Admonishments/Cautions: A simple warning or caution from the court or police usually doesn't create a permanent criminal record.


why lah need pusing?

This is an expected post from u & those like u.

A person called for questioning as a witness doesn't suddenly transmogrify into a suspect/criminal.

The Melaka pulis chief keeps pusing. That is a sign of desperation. Only offenders trying to cover up need to resort to underhanded desperate tactics.

That's why lah our parents or teachers always reminds us not to mingle with bad company coz bad company corrupts good
character

so the said women can get certificate of good conduct from police or not?

Totally irrelevant to the original charges being made. And she doesn't needs such a validation to act as a person who makes a report. It's a good thing the lawyers more than a person like u.

anak saya baik orangnya.