not all of us billionaire can go london to get treatment

Maybe the change of mindset is important oso.

Just DGAF will ease your mind

This post has been edited by Ayambetul: Yesterday, 12:24 PM

on the same note, most ppl cannot afford to live past 65 anymore too

Retiring early is worst then retiring later. If you retire too early and you dont work, your brain gradually slow down. You might fall into depression, possibility of dementia and other illness ralated to old age may set in faster. Working too hard late into your age might kill you, if you are too stressed but not working will end up dying a slow death.

I understand that old folk have difficult to learn new thing. So "stuck in their old ways" is fine. In term of skill and thinking. Just don't bash the new gens with the old way.

But you don't stop thinking if know that's not healthy.

What you mean "same with those that retire around 60yo" ?

50 and im done.

some ppl cant even retired. this list is scam

or train the mind to not allow stress live rent free in the mind?

I don't see him retiring. Cause his hobby is work.

The kesian is the worker around him. Always kena bash.


Ya, agree.

so many ppl have nothing going on in their lifes that work is their everything.

crazy how some of you sheeps and generational slaves who think life = work.

Worst part is, these are the kind of people who like to bash and self-project onto others like "wah u do nothing ah? waah not working ah? wah so brain slowdown ah"... like bitch please just keep working your 9-5, noone that manages to retire early will tell you life is more than work, just stay being a slave.

The table appears on a web page titled “Longevity Vs. Retirement Age” (or similar), which claims the data come from “pension checks sent to retirees of Boeing Aerospace.”
KFUPM Faculty
+1

The same data shows up in a document referred to as Optimum Strategies for Creativity and Longevity (by someone named Sing Lin) referencing Cheng’s “study.”
The Online Citizen
+1

However — and this is important — the “study” is widely regarded today as an urban myth, not a genuine peer-reviewed or publicly verifiable actuarial report.
intmath.com
+2
Singapore Management University (SMU)
+2

The company itself (Boeing) reportedly issued a statement titled something like “Let’s Retire the Rumor about Life Expectancy,” saying there is no correlation between retirement age and life expectancy in its data.
intmath.com
+1

Independent analyses (e.g. on forums and fact-checking blogs) note that no original study or data source — with date, method, sample size — has ever been published or verified.
Skeptics Stack Exchange
+1

In summary:

The chart you posted is a reproduction of that “Boeing / Cheng” table that’s circulated on the Internet.

There is no credible evidence that the underlying study was ever published in a scientific or actuarial journal.

The consensus is that the “study” is bogus, or at least unverifiable.





chatgpt -

This post has been edited by klmc: Yesterday, 02:19 PM