NATO plans to place nuclear missiles right next to the Russia border if Ukraine joins NATO.

Ever heard of Cuban missile crisis?

When the U.S.S.R. tried to place its nuke missiles one thousand miles away from America's border, America quickly threatened to conquer Cuba within days.

But luckily U.S.S.R. doesn't want to drag Cuba into war, so they withdraws their nuclear missiles from Cuban soil.

Same shait, but this time Russia has already warned repeatedly not to expand NATO to their borders, NATO which was created to counter the U.S.S.R power, but somehow instead of following the agreement made, they keep expanding NATO.

If America has the right to wage war on a country that is one thousand miles away to prevent nuclear missiles from being placed there, why can't Russia?

Unlucky for Ukraine, America wants the war, because it is the best investment.

NATO highly recommended to place nuclear as deterrence.

https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterren...uclear%20forces

It is highly recommended, what more do you want?

Already admitted that killing Russians and weakening their military is beneficial to the war cartels, the best investment.

Ukraine didn't join NATO, and they already received nonstop "assistance" from the NATO & US.

Lol everything also need to be spoonfeed.

You read the link I provided from NATO's own page, the first paragraph:

https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/deterren...licy-and-forces

Core components, understood?

NATO is fully committed to arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation. Since the height of the Cold War, it has reduced the size of its land-based nuclear weapons stockpile by over 90 per cent, reducing the number of nuclear weapons stationed in Europe and its reliance on nuclear weapons in strategy.

The core component to make an ICE car to drive is what?

Fuel? Engine? Wheels?

If you take out one of the core components, does the ICE car work?

Then all 3 are highly recommended to make the ICE car work right?

So the core components translate to highly recommended.

And now ICE cars are fewer with EVs in the market.

Everything also needs to be spoonfed, unbelievable.

I already answered the highly recommended part, now you are trying to shift the goal post again.

Core components, but now many new weapons have been invented, see Ukraine has been the battleground to test out all these new weapons and clear out old stockpile by NATO.

But weird thing is, Ukraine didn't even join NATO yet.

Lol, you just answered it yourself with your own statement above.

You don't need many nukes as a deterrence, nevertheless it is highly recommended to have it, it is NATO's core component for defense and deterrence.

Only need 1 engine as a core component to make a car drive, you don't need too many.

Then it is NATO's own fault, for putting a conflicting statement on their own official website.

Nevertheless it is a core component for defense and deterrence, logically it is.

You yourself have low comprehension, already stated in the first paragraph nuclear is a core component for defense and deterrence.

Trying hard to refute NATO's own admissions, they have a nuclear sharing program.
NATO itself admitted in the first paragraph on their page that it is a core component for defense and deterrence.

That's why America doesn't dare to invade North Korea, they are trying to use South Korea as a proxy war.

Remember the South Korean president went crazy and blocked the Parliament session?
They didn't drop bombs on Libya with depleted uranium bombs, also they provided humanitarian assistance immediately.

They work under the banner of the U.N, mostly with humanitarian assistance.

That's why Libyan casualties don't reach millions like in Iraq.
Ukraine didn't even join NATO yet, and look at all the "assistance" they are getting.

It is a NATO core component for defense and deterrence for a reason.

Where is your source that Qatar and UAE provided their military asset to bomb Libya?
It is NATO's core components for defense and deterrence, as stated on first paragraph, it is clear cut, why you people still think that it is not impossible for Ukraine to apply for it is beneath me.

Even when Ukraine is not part of NATO, you can clearly see how much weapons and "assistance" being funnel to Ukraine with ease since day one.
https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic...uclear-sharing/

The first paragraph still says it is a core component for defense and deterrence, no matter how you try to twist and turn.

That's why the US didn't dare to try to conquer North Korea as they plan to do with Venezuela, they try to use South Korea as a proxy.

Still remember the crazy president in South Korea blocking the parliamentary process?
Nice way to goal shift, hebat!

I said NATO France bombed Libya using depleted uranium, and you try to insinuate that other countries also do the same in Libya.

Those things destroy farm land for good.

First paragraph still says nuclear is a core component to defense and deterrence, logically it is.

Trying hard to deny the first paragraph is a funny attempt, lol.

Core component = highly recommended as defense and deterrence.

no one's saying that its not a core component

Good question. Short answer: no — NATO does not recommend giving nuclear weapons to Ukraine. Its publicly stated position is quite the opposite.

Because Ukraine is not part of NATO yet, so the A.I answered it logically.

And you expect for US or NATO to reveal their future plan for Ukraine once they join NATO ahead of time? Ridiculous.

But you could already see so many kinds of weapons and "assistance" being given to Ukraine nonstop even before they join NATO.

Almost everyone thought Russia could defeat Ukraine easily, but NATO & US meddling have prolonged the war for this long.

Laugh at yourself, I already proved that it is highly recommended to place nuclear as a deterrence.

It is entirely possible for Ukraine to request a nuclear sharing program under the NATO banner as Poland did.

I already provided NATO's official page, the first paragraph already stated that nuclear is a core component of defense and deterrence.

Yet here you are still trying hard to shift the goal post like a sore loser. So hilarious.

I already proved my point, but clearly, you just can't call it a day, trying hard to keep shifting the goal post.

NATO official site, first paragraph, thanks for playing.

You asked me to prove where it says that NATO recommends nuclear as a deterrence, I provided NATO's own official page, in the first paragraph, nuclear is a core component to defense and deterrence.

Yet you are still trying hard to shift the goal post, hahaha, so pathetic lol.

which part of it says they're going to place nukes as you said?

Because having nuclear weapons in Ukraine once they join NATO is the ONLY deterrence against Russia force from invading them

Because NATO highly recommends it as a deterrence.

That's why Russia rushed in to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO.

See Poland do it too, as deterrence.
https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic...uclear-sharing/

Not assumptions, NATO itself says it is a core component for defense and deterrence in the first paragraph.

Every NATO member can request a nuclear sharing program.

If Ukraine joins NATO, requesting nuclear weapons for defense and deterrence might save them from being invaded.

But Russia rushes in to prevent it from happening.

Then why do Ukrainian politicians diehard want to join NATO when they know Russia is completely against the idea?

They are expecting NATO protection right? And one of NATO's core components to defense and deterrence is nuclear.

Also fyi, Ukraine is no longer a sovereign nation, no longer a democratic nation, they already killed or imprisoned most of the opposition in Ukraine right when the war started, to make sure the war will go on as planned.

Like how the South Korean president was trying to block the parliamentary session to start a war with North Korea.

If they kill all opposition in South Korea, they can guarantee war with North Korea, like how Ukraine did it.
It doesn't cause as much harm for many decades like Agent Orange or depleted uranium.

You can easily remove the lead without protective gear.

Depleted uranium and Agent Orange will cause harm to newborn babies for more than half a century or more.

You are basically trying to harm future generations with those kinds of weapons, so evil beyond words.

Depleted uranium, uranium?

Even its decay stable form is lead.
Yep, Putin will not dare, NATO countries are well protected.

That's why Putin thinks he could beat Ukraine easily before Ukraine joined NATO, but he miscalculated, Ukraine since day one already received US and NATO help in weapons, assistance, propaganda campaign, and intelligence since day one of the war.

You heard Lindsay Graham say, the only way Ukraine will lose the war is if they pull the plug out.


Because NATO's core components for defense and deterrence are nuclear, which is what Ukraine is seeking by joining NATO.