The first paragraph still says it is a core component for defense and deterrence, no matter how you try to twist and turn.

That's why the US didn't dare to try to conquer North Korea as they plan to do with Venezuela, they try to use South Korea as a proxy.

Still remember the crazy president in South Korea blocking the parliamentary process?

Nice way to goal shift, hebat!

I said NATO France bombed Libya using depleted uranium, and you try to insinuate that other countries also do the same in Libya.

Those things destroy farm land for good.

Another guy is trying hard to shift the goal post.

Whether it is allowed or not, France's decision to use depleted uranium on Libyan soil is a serious issue that will cause health problem to the populace for many decades.

Agent Orange was not banned by the UN during the Vietnam War, so it was okay for the US to use it then?



First paragraph still says nuclear is a core component to defense and deterrence, logically it is.

Trying hard to deny the first paragraph is a funny attempt, lol.

Core component = highly recommended as defense and deterrence.

Because Ukraine is not part of NATO yet, so the A.I answered it logically.

And you expect for US or NATO to reveal their future plan for Ukraine once they join NATO ahead of time? Ridiculous.

But you could already see so many kinds of weapons and "assistance" being given to Ukraine nonstop even before they join NATO.

Almost everyone thought Russia could defeat Ukraine easily, but NATO & US meddling have prolonged the war for this long.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 12:14 AM

Laugh at yourself, I already proved that it is highly recommended to place nuclear as a deterrence.

It is entirely possible for Ukraine to request a nuclear sharing program under the NATO banner as Poland did.

I already provided NATO's official page, the first paragraph already stated that nuclear is a core component of defense and deterrence.

Yet here you are still trying hard to shift the goal post like a sore loser. So hilarious.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 01:02 AM

Depleted uranium is basically like Agent Orange, it ruins the land for the generation to come, and will cause birth defects and health problems for decades to come.

Also for your information, I condemn Russia for invading Ukraine.

You are mistaken that since I make a thread about an American senator saying the war is the best investment, it doesn't mean I am pro Russia.

Same with the COVID-19 experimental MRNA vaccine, against an experimental vaccine, doesn't mean I am anti-vaccine.

I just don't like to be used like lab rats and sign a waiver form.


Just that I found it so disgusting that an American senator was gloating about it so openly many times.

I already proved my point, but clearly, you just can't call it a day, trying hard to keep shifting the goal post.

NATO official site, first paragraph, thanks for playing.

You asked me to prove where it says that NATO recommends nuclear as a deterrence, I provided NATO's own official page, in the first paragraph, nuclear is a core component to defense and deterrence.

Yet you are still trying hard to shift the goal post, hahaha, so pathetic lol.

Because having nuclear weapons in Ukraine once they join NATO is the ONLY deterrence against Russia force from invading them

Because NATO highly recommends it as a deterrence.

That's why Russia rushed in to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO.

See Poland do it too, as deterrence.



https://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic...uclear-sharing/

Not assumptions, NATO itself says it is a core component for defense and deterrence in the first paragraph.

Every NATO member can request a nuclear sharing program.

If Ukraine joins NATO, requesting nuclear weapons for defense and deterrence might save them from being invaded.

But Russia rushes in to prevent it from happening.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 11:25 AM

Then why do Ukrainian politicians diehard want to join NATO when they know Russia is completely against the idea?

They are expecting NATO protection right? And one of NATO's core components to defense and deterrence is nuclear.

Also fyi, Ukraine is no longer a sovereign nation, no longer a democratic nation, they already killed or imprisoned most of the opposition in Ukraine right when the war started, to make sure the war will go on as planned.

Like how the South Korean president was trying to block the parliamentary session to start a war with North Korea.

If they kill all opposition in South Korea, they can guarantee war with North Korea, like how Ukraine did it.

It doesn't cause as much harm for many decades like Agent Orange or depleted uranium.

You can easily remove the lead without protective gear.

Depleted uranium and Agent Orange will cause harm to newborn babies for more than half a century or more.

You are basically trying to harm future generations with those kinds of weapons, so evil beyond words.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 01:43 PM

Agent Orange has been proven in Vietnam to cause birth defects after many decades.

Depleted uranium, not even a standard protective suit can shield you from its harm.

But lead can be removed safely by planting the right plants to absorb its toxicity.

You don't need a protective suit when you walk to a lead-contaminated place, just a proper mask is sufficient.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 02:03 PM

You go check how long depleted uranium will cause harm to the environment if not taken care of immediately.

Also, lead contamination has happened throughout the century with wall paints, toy paint, etc.

Radiation, normal protective suit can't prevent radiation from penetrating the suit.

The suit is only good against virus/bacteria/heavy metal toxicity.

I already mention NORMAL protective suit doesn't work.

You go check what depleted uranium will decay as.



https://www.cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca/eng/resources/f...um-perspective/

Depleted uranium, uranium?

Even its decay stable form is lead.

Yep, Putin will not dare, NATO countries are well protected.

That's why Putin thinks he could beat Ukraine easily before Ukraine joined NATO, but he miscalculated, Ukraine since day one already received US and NATO help in weapons, assistance, propaganda campaign, and intelligence since day one of the war.

You heard Lindsay Graham say, the only way Ukraine will lose the war is if they pull the plug out.


Because NATO's core components for defense and deterrence are nuclear, which is what Ukraine is seeking by joining NATO.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 03:57 PM

I already answered it, but you do not have intellectual capacity to connect the dots.

Why Ukraine diehard joining NATO?

Why Russia quickly invade Ukraine before they got the chance to join NATO?

Because NATO core components to defense and deterrence is not something anyone would like to go against, not even Russia.

A normal/standard protective suit does not protect from radiation.





https://www.osha.gov/ionizing-radiation/control-prevention

Shift goal post again?

Isn’t it ironic? You need to wear a leaded apron to be safe from radiation?

The uranium radiation decays stable form is lead.

This post has been edited by smsid: Dec 4 2025, 04:09 PM

Hahaha, this is fun, thanks for playing.

https://www.politico.eu/article/give-ukrain...ymyr-zelenskyy/