Easy?
And how long does it take to remove lead contamination from soil using plants?
What are the limitations of using this method?

Go read up on radioactivity risk of depleted uranium before you start spinning here la.

You go check how long depleted uranium will cause harm to the environment if not taken care of immediately.

Also, lead contamination has happened throughout the century with wall paints, toy paint, etc.

Am i the one that claim not even protective suit can save you from depleted uranium harm?
So where your sos?

so it has happened we can continue to add more to it?
Simpanlah bodo sikit.

Yes, its clearly not working as you have given up on trolling.
My response is to see you still butthurt.

As expected of a 50 IQ ph4g that sees my response as trolling. Still no arguments to make?

Radiation, normal protective suit can't prevent radiation from penetrating the suit.

The suit is only good against virus/bacteria/heavy metal toxicity.

I already mention NORMAL protective suit doesn't work.

And here comes seriosekitt3h replacement.
You must be naive to think your baiting is working. lol!

It is working very well. Look at your cope. Kek

Nice, nice. You still butthurt. Lol!

Kecian you still no sos and spinning here.

Yes, depleted uranium will eventually decay to lead, but it takes billions of years.

The decay process involves a long series of radioactive transformations, with each step creating a new, slightly more stable element until the final stable isotopes of lead (Pbcap P b 𝑃𝑏 isotopes) are formed.

After each transformation, the elements obtained are referred to as radioactive decay products. Eventually, the uranium atom will transform into lead, which is a stable element.

"muh butthurt." I love the projection

You go check what depleted uranium will decay as.
https://www.cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca/eng/resources/f...um-perspective/

Ur trolling and baiting failed
I had a good laugh at ur expense.

Sadly as seriosekitt3h replacement, you are a failure also.

Sekian sahaja. lol!

Then why do Ukrainian politicians diehard want to join NATO when they know Russia is completely against the idea?

They are expecting NATO protection right? And one of NATO's core components to defense and deterrence is nuclear.

Also fyi, Ukraine is no longer a sovereign nation, no longer a democratic nation, they already killed or imprisoned most of the opposition in Ukraine right when the war started, to make sure the war will go on as planned.

Like how the South Korean president was trying to block the parliamentary session to start a war with North Korea.

If they kill all opposition in South Korea, they can guarantee war with North Korea, like how Ukraine did it.
It doesn't cause as much harm for many decades like Agent Orange or depleted uranium.

You can easily remove the lead without protective gear.

Depleted uranium and Agent Orange will cause harm to newborn babies for more than half a century or more.

You are basically trying to harm future generations with those kinds of weapons, so evil beyond words.

Where it says the hazards of depleted uranium ammunition?
As usual you nitpicking to fit your narrative.

Sarahan NATO not include in report again? lol!

Sounds like you think nuclear-sharing means ukraine gets control of nukes.

You do realise that even if nato placed nukes on ukraine, and ukraine is a nato member, the only power that can use the nukes is the one contributing the nuke itself (usually the us) right? You fail to realise that being in nato itself is a deterrent - notice how russia has issues eith many of its neighbours apart from those who are already in nato.

Because with or without nukes, putin doesnt dare to touch nato.

All the right of your rambling doesnt have to do with the main question, which you still havent answered: where in that page does it say nato wants to put nukes in ukraine?

Depleted uranium, uranium?

Even its decay stable form is lead.
Yep, Putin will not dare, NATO countries are well protected.

That's why Putin thinks he could beat Ukraine easily before Ukraine joined NATO, but he miscalculated, Ukraine since day one already received US and NATO help in weapons, assistance, propaganda campaign, and intelligence since day one of the war.

You heard Lindsay Graham say, the only way Ukraine will lose the war is if they pull the plug out.


Because NATO's core components for defense and deterrence are nuclear, which is what Ukraine is seeking by joining NATO.

Depleted uranium, uranium?

Even its decay stable form is lead.
Yep, Putin will not dare, NATO countries are well protected.

That's why Putin thinks he could beat Ukraine easily before Ukraine joined NATO, but he miscalculated, Ukraine since day one already received US and NATO help in weapons, assistance, propaganda campaign, and intelligence since day one of the war.

You heard Lindsay Graham say, the only way Ukraine will lose the war is if they pull the plug out.


Because NATO's core components for defense and deterrence are nuclear, which is what Ukraine is seeking by joining NATO.

No need to type so much, just answer the question lol

I still dun see your sos on the hazard of depleted uranium ammunition that protective suit wont save you.
Sos mana?

That is correct; standard protective suits, often called "hazmat suits" or anti-contamination suits, do not protect from most forms of external radiation exposure.

PPE will not protect workers from direct, external radiation exposure (e.g., standing in an X-ray field), unless the PPE contains shielding material. For example, a leaded apron will reduce X-ray doses to covered areas.