Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

News Singer Maki Otsuki was abruptly cut off by CCP

views
     
Adrian909
post Yesterday, 10:36 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(30624770 @ Nov 29 2025, 08:59 AM)
A lot of Japanese like a lot of ktards here has always had bad perception of China  whistling.gif

So, why beat around the bush anymore when Japan had stated their official stand. What's the point trying to be nice when the other side are outright challenging you.

Let's be honest here, Japanese PM cause all the trouble and the only solution to cool down situation needs to come from her. Taiwan issue is a national issue to China and it actually threatened CCP indirectly. If CCP lose Taiwan, their standing among the people in China will be badly affected
*
No country have an issue if china wants to reunite with Taiwan through peaceful means. The pre-requisite for Japan to enter the 'war' is when china uses force. Simply don't use force.

Just because china doesn't start any war during WW2 doesn't mean they wouldn't do in the future. Similarly, just because Japan is involve in WW2 doesn't mean she will do it in the future.

So are you saying you're supporting china to start a war for their reunification?
Adrian909
post Yesterday, 11:03 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(30624770 @ Nov 29 2025, 10:49 AM)
You do know that China's stand is they will only go to war if Taiwan declare independence. That is the line they will not let Taiwan cross. Japan openly saying they will defend Taiwan is basically challenging one China policy and encouraging Taiwan's independence. Worse of all is Japan has a very bad reputation because of WW2. We will not understand because we never suffered a century of humiliation.
*
The 2005 Anti-Secession Law provides the legal basis for China's use of "non-peaceful means" in specific situations:
-If "Taiwan independence" separatist forces formally declare independence under any name or by any means.
-If "major incidents entailing Taiwan's separation from China" occur.
-If the possibilities for a peaceful reunification are completely exhausted.

Even if Taiwan doesn't declare independence, china reserve the right to use force to reclaim Taiwan.

Adrian909
post Yesterday, 04:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(DoomCognition @ Nov 29 2025, 02:44 PM)
By your logic, I hope you will trust an ex-convict of armed robbery to look after your parent's house than to trust any other normal person.
*
This is a weird comparison. Then why did china bother to sign the Japan–China Joint Communiqué? If they (japanese) are robbers, then don't accept any investments from Japan. China should immediately cut ties with Japan.

This post has been edited by Adrian909: Yesterday, 04:39 PM
Adrian909
post Yesterday, 06:09 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(DoomCognition @ Nov 29 2025, 05:50 PM)
Fact is Japanese massacred millions of East Asians and South East Asians during their occupation. They are clearly the aggressor during WW2. China did NOT kill millions by invading other country. Now that 80 years have passed, many are calling to move on because it is "in the past". Hence my comparison of Japan as an ex-robber is correct.

Accepting investments and have peace with Japan is akin to have peace with a robber and to do business. A rational thing to do if you don't have a choice, aka it is just a neighbour. But that not mean that when it comes to colonial tendencies, both China and Japan are the same. Far from it. One is an ex-robber, one stick to its own borders. Big difference.

On Taiwan, it is clearly China's internal matters. Since you brought up the Communique, it clearly states "The Government of the People's Republic of China reiterates that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China. The Government of Japan fully understands and respects this stance of the Government of the People's Republic of China, and it firmly maintains its stand under Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation.". So who is Japan to interfere, regardless if China invades Taiwan or not?

Seems like you are selective in your reading of the Communique.
*
AI doesn't think so.

AI Overview
No, the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué states Japan "fully understands and respects" the PRC's position that "Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China," but it does not explicitly "acknowledge" that Taiwan belongs to China. This distinction reflects Japan's continued ambiguity and its insistence on complying with the Potsdam Declaration
Adrian909
post Yesterday, 06:45 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(DoomCognition @ Nov 29 2025, 06:14 PM)
Find a clause in the Communique, don't just simply quote AI. Look at what I posted, it is clear that it is part of China. What else is there to pusing?
*
That's the clause fully understands and respects =/ acknowledge.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0133sec    1.57    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:21 PM