Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 DaGe sudah marah - M'sia trade deal with US

views
     
smsid
post Nov 28 2025, 04:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(Avex @ Nov 28 2025, 03:36 PM)
grave concern meaning already project onhold with malaysia, stop work order, kecian machinery on hold, to restart going to take another diplomatic effort
*
That's why I said months ago, never take anyone's side.

Two elephant fights, we should avoid getting dragged into it.

But now Anwar has signed the agreement and taken side.

This post has been edited by smsid: Nov 28 2025, 04:08 PM
smsid
post Nov 28 2025, 04:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(Chowda @ Nov 28 2025, 04:15 PM)
I am curious which parts of the deal The Dragon is concerned about
*
QUOTE
Article 3.3: Digital Trade Agreements

Malaysia shall consult with the United States before entering into a new digital trade agreement with another country that jeopardizes essential U.S. interests.


Stupid right?

Now we must prioritize America interest instead of our own country interest.
smsid
post Nov 28 2025, 04:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(heaven @ Nov 28 2025, 04:25 PM)
If not mistaken even locally, MY gov also sign stuff lopsided to some GLC's interest, right? right?, Ooof the burn.
*
Lol, you are comparing our GLC with America that has bombed and killed millions of people in the last 2 decades?

You know those rare earths will be used to create more weapons and war.

This post has been edited by smsid: Nov 28 2025, 04:29 PM
smsid
post Nov 28 2025, 04:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(Chowda @ Nov 28 2025, 04:30 PM)
Confirm is this Clause? If just consult only, decision still have to be made by MY
*
Do you understand?

We must tell them every agreement we wish to enter to get their "consult" or blessing first.
smsid
post Nov 28 2025, 04:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(Chowda @ Nov 28 2025, 04:40 PM)
Ya, that is to be expected. If just wording like that, China still has an opening, doesn't seem like that Clause that would trigger them to say what they said.
*
They are famous for using vague words in agreement, but it is there for a great purpose.

QUOTE
Malaysia shall consult with the United States before entering into a new digital trade agreement with another country that jeopardizes essential U.S. interests.


If we unknowingly enter agreement that endangers U.S. interests, do we get punished?

What is the punishment for not knowingly consulting with the US first if we were caught breaking it?

See, it uses vague words which is to entrap us.

To give them future justification.

This post has been edited by smsid: Nov 28 2025, 04:52 PM
smsid
post Nov 28 2025, 08:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(koja6049 @ Nov 28 2025, 06:01 PM)
actually we signed two agreements, one earlier with china when Xi Jinping came, then another one with USA when Trump came. So we really did take both sides KEK  whistling.gif
*
But one side is a bloodthirsty warmonger who has bombed and killed millions of people, who wants badly to bomb China next.

But too scared to confront them head-to-head, so instead of that, they want Ukraine 2.0 pencacai to weaken China next.

This post has been edited by smsid: Nov 28 2025, 09:01 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0120sec    0.88    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 01:26 PM