606 units all in large 3–4 bedroom layouts on only about 2+ acres of land isn’t actually considered low-density by typical KL standards, maybe by Mah Sing standards it is, lol. The density also becomes more noticeable because the site is right beside two Mah Sing projects (already high-density) plus an older apartment beside it.

This post has been edited by chuanyou: Nov 26 2025, 11:19 PM

Yes, I understand what you mentioned, the density could be even worse, like 350 units on 0.5 acres. But I’m just correcting the point you made earlier: it is not low-density in any sense. I’m not saying it’s high-density either, just medium-high when compared to KL’s standards. Still, it’s good to see Mah Sing reducing from high to medium-high density. You can push density as high as possible to bring costs down, but there will always be other developers who build even denser projects to make their projects cheaper.

The main reason many people are against Mah Sing here is because of their branding. We already know what to expect from developers like Mah Sing, PV, Radium, and Akisama when we see their signboards listed. People rarely welcomes these developers into their neighbourhood because they tend to make the area more crowded while adding little to no value in terms of planning or community benefits. On the other hand, you don’t usually see people going against about Sunway, even if they are only doing a small pocket development, right?