Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FIFA sanction FAM checkmate

views
     
jaapers
post Sep 28 2025, 05:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Sep 28 2025, 02:09 PM)
During the FIFA committee appeal, yes, but in an external court FIFA must already show proof of why they disagree. For now you can still prove the grandma was born in Malaysia based on document from JPN. FIFA can still reject it without giving a reason just like certain courts here that sometimes reject appeals without justifying their decision which feels abusive.

But honestly it’s not hard to prove you were born here right. Your neighbors, your primary school records, your relatives all of them are strong proof. If you were born in PJ there would surely be plenty of evidence right.
*
So FAM/JPN should furnish the proof that the grandmas were born here. But I can bet they will not go that far, there's hardly any details other than 'we followed the procedure'. The more they protest without furnishing evidence, the more it looks bad on them. If they do furnish evidence, the more worms will come out of the can.

Why some people get citizenship so easily? Why some other people with genuine lost documentation have such a hard time to get replacement document? Everyone is hoping to get these answered. FAM is stuck in a hard place, dig more and expose yourself or lose your dignity.
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 06:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(lakini80 @ Oct 7 2025, 05:19 PM)
har...forged documents wo....

someone is approving it without doing more due diligence checking...
*
Actually, are there really any forged documents? NRD already issued official birthcert to the 7 grandmas. I would think the issue is that NRD did it using methods that FIFA and basically everyone else would not agree with. Its still a valid document, as NRD has full authority to issue it as they please.
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 06:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(JohnL77 @ Oct 7 2025, 06:34 PM)
Da da.. Semua salah ejen ikan bilis.

Kakitangan tersilap muat naik dokumen daripada ejen, bukan dokumen rasmi dikeluarkan JPN - FAM
Authority only in Malaysia.
*
Yes. It will not be recognized by FIFA or anyone with a brain. But I dont think forged documentation is the right term here.

Anyway, the buck stops with NRD here. FAM can just say they follow NRD documentation. FIFA rejects and blames FAM. FAM can easily blame NRD. NRD will have no one to blame, they will just say citizenship process is under OSA and turtle up. I can imagine NRD being more silent than a dead body now.
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 06:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Avenger_2012 @ Oct 7 2025, 06:41 PM)
Think carefully. So if NRD decided to issue birth cert to Donald Trump, then it is valid? It’s the forgery of supporting documents that makes the cert to be invalid
*
Its a technical issue. If they claim that there are evidence to support Donald trump being born in malaysia, they have the authority to do so.

Its like a university, they are the authority to issue bachelor degree certificates. If for some really stupid reason they decide to issue a certificate to someone who didnt even study there, its still a valid cert. Their reputation would crash, but the cert remains real, not a forged cert. A forged cert is only considered forged if someone else other than the authority creates it or edits it.
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 06:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(11c @ Oct 7 2025, 06:51 PM)
user posted image

Cool down guys … fifa wrong

They banned mAlasya not Malaysia
*
Looks like everyone knows malaysia reputation of being malas...
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 07:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Odinn @ Oct 7 2025, 06:57 PM)
The regulation in question cites "forgery and/or fraud". And FIFA believes they have enough evidence to charge FAM for fraud, as shown by the revealing of the birthplaces differing from what FAM gave. Even worse is that FAM claimed the birth certs/records could not be located. But FIFA found them.

Legitimate or not, go back to the hospital on record, do some proper fact finding. Then see who is lying.
*
Fraud would be a more suitable term here. Too bad NRD wont likely be held accountable for this.
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 08:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(river.sand @ Oct 7 2025, 07:16 PM)
If you were born in KL, can you change your birth place to Singapore?

NRD can't issue birth certificate to someone not born in Malaysia.
*
They clearly did here

This post has been edited by jaapers: Oct 7 2025, 08:14 PM
jaapers
post Oct 7 2025, 11:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Oct 7 2025, 07:58 PM)
This situation is different. When it comes to university degrees it's possible to study at multiple universities at the same time and each one may choose to award a degree to you. But a person can’t be born in two countries at once. FIFA had already asked for the necessary information before the punishment was given. You claimed that you had done proper checks and even confirmed that the grandma was born in Malaysia. That’s why there are now allegations of forgery or falsification. Saying it was a technical error isn’t convincing because you had already confirmed her Malaysian birthplace something FIFA has since disproven with the original birthplace.
*
Nrd only sees what they can see or in this case, what they want to see. I think what they saw was a big eagle hovering in front of them. They generated a legit cert. It doesn't matter to them there was another birth cert, to them it's irrelevant.

From FAM perspective, they will claim their checking is thru the authority, which is NRD.
jaapers
post Oct 9 2025, 02:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(United Rulez @ Oct 8 2025, 09:15 PM)
"Mcm nak bagi hint ni  cool2.gif , rilek lah meow meow tau apa nak buat nanti."
*
Got some extremely spicy comments around one hour ago, including a picture depicting the eagle with pig nose and ear
jaapers
post Oct 9 2025, 07:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(teehk_tee @ Oct 9 2025, 06:51 PM)
I see.
So the point in contention isn't whether these guys are citizens, but whether the documents used to prove their grandparents were Malaysians is sus or not
*
QUOTE
Footballers in FAM-FIFA issue met Constitutional citizenship criteria, says Home Minister

These guys pusing2 dunno want to tipu who. The bigger question of the grandma birth cert not explained. Everyone wants to know how all 7 grandparents can have Malaysia birth certs and how all 7 lost their original birth certs and how there are records of all 7 birth certs in other countries. They really think we are stupid.
jaapers
post Oct 9 2025, 10:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(GalaxyV @ Oct 9 2025, 10:23 PM)
why dont check back hospital record or immigration to know if they really came to malaysia that period?
*
I'm sure all of those records were also 'lost'
jaapers
post Nov 5 2025, 08:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 5 2025, 04:25 AM)
In this case, FIFA would need to produce official proof from Spain, either an official letter confirming that the grandma was born there or testimony from a Spanish authority.

FIFA cannot simply rely on a scanned copy of the grandma's Spanish birth cert that has been circulating online as valid proof.
*
Do you think FIFA doesn't have the proof in their pockets?
jaapers
post Nov 18 2025, 11:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
Fifa released the detailed decision liao. It gives Malaysia just another level of shame..

user posted image
Link

QUOTE
The Players, while they claim that they never read, checked or in any way verified any of the
documents, emphasize in their written submissions that these documents were authentic and
unaltered at the time these were given to their respective agents. They argue that any manipulation
occurred after the documents were handed over to FAM and without their knowledge or
involvement. Except for Player 1, who handed over the documents in person to his agent and has
not produced a copy of the documentation in these proceedings, the other Players filed as evidence
the corresponding screenshots and WhatsApp conversation with their agents, all of which depict
birth certificates of their grandparents, and none of which lists a place of birth in Malaysia (or
territories that now comprise the country of Malaysia).


This post has been edited by jaapers: Nov 18 2025, 11:24 AM
jaapers
post Nov 18 2025, 11:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Phoenix_KL @ Nov 18 2025, 11:43 AM)
Fifa to probe FAM over falsified documents fiasco

56 mins ago
FMT Reporters
The probe will also determine whether additional disciplinary measures are warranted against FAM officials.
https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/...ocuments-fiasco
*
Serves them right for wanting to go to war with FIFA just to cover their own dirty backside
jaapers
post Nov 18 2025, 01:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(and85rew @ Nov 18 2025, 01:00 PM)
Now MY malu bcoz of this
*
whole country malu because of someone's ego
jaapers
post Nov 18 2025, 02:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 5 2025, 09:12 AM)
Just mentioning one country is enough there’s no need to list so many. I’m just giving you a clue as to how only FIFA can win, because once the case is brought before CAS, the onus is on FIFA to prove it. FAM claims that FIFA did not show them the proof.
*
So do you still have any doubts FIFA can win?
jaapers
post Nov 18 2025, 05:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 18 2025, 02:44 PM)
I haven’t read the full judgment but it appears they have changed their strategy to place the blame on the sender and to argue that FAM had no intention to commit the alleged wrongdoing.

Usually this only works to convince CAS/FIFA if that person has been charged in court for negligence or if he appears before CAS to admit that the negligence was his, is willing to take full responsibility and explains that FAM had nothing to do with the allegation and that it was merely his personal mistake.
*
Let me make it easy for you. Here's a snippet from the release

user posted image

I think previously you were wondering if FIFA had the ability to get a hold of the original birth certs. Does this clear up your doubt?
jaapers
post Nov 18 2025, 05:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 18 2025, 05:22 PM)
At that stage, it was all speculation since we did not know what defense FAM was relying on. Now that it is clear their defense is that the staff sent the wrong files, the issue of birthplace is no longer relevant.
*
So now the claim is that its all the staff fault, they submitted forged documents, so we dont need to argue on the correct place of birth anymore?

Dont forget that FAM also submitted the Malaysian birth cert of the grandparents (after submitting the forged copy of the foreign birth cert documents). You dont find it curious why would FAM say 'actually the forged documents was accidentally submitted, but here's the malaysian official birth cert to prove that the forged foreign birth certs are actually legit'?

Its clear FAM still considers Malaysia to be the birth place. its not just about mistakenly submitted documents.

jaapers
post Nov 19 2025, 12:14 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 18 2025, 08:17 PM)
Company A wanted to borrow a loan to expand its business. Later, it was discovered that staff had formatted the documents handed over to the bank. So should the court punish Company A or the staff? This is likely the defense being raised.
*
Your stand always seems to align with FAMs stand.

If the company accidentally handed over forged documents, and they are truly innocent, would they submit more documents that tries to prove the forged documents are legit? No, they would say sorry, it was a mistake
But this company doubled down and submitted the Malaysian birth cert, to try to prove that the documents were not forged. This shows they are not sorry, it wasn't a mistaken submission. This shows they are trying to disprove that it was a forged document.

Judges will definitely see through the intent, FAM is royally f*cked here. If FAM didn't double down, then it would be more believable that the forged documents were submitted in error.
jaapers
post Nov 19 2025, 12:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
141 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Schumacher @ Nov 19 2025, 12:21 AM)
There is no such word as ‘accidentally’ in the judgment.

I’m just explaining their defence strategy because many people don’t understand it including you. You should ask Eagle why.
*
I understand their defense. I'm saying that it won't work because their following actions post forged document submission clearly shows intent to deceive.

But here you are trying hard to make their defense seem logical.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0475sec    0.69    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 05:01 PM