QUOTE(takbodoh722 @ Sep 11 2025, 10:15 AM)
The age breakdown is ~10m population for those age 0-19. Its 3.1m for those 20-24 and ~2.7m population for those age 65 and above.
34-10-2.7 = 21.3m should represent the full labour force (20-64).
Even if minus 3.1 assuming everyone doesn't work until age 25 in bolehland and no one works beyond 64, there is still an under-accounting of the labour force of ~2m.
The housewife segment should be pretty big, otherwise people retire very early.
I wouldn't pat the back just because someone only record 0.5m as unemployment.
Labour force has a specific meaning, and excludes those who are not seeking work (including housewives, people on sabbaticals, those living off otger incomes etc). It's not just based on age.34-10-2.7 = 21.3m should represent the full labour force (20-64).
Even if minus 3.1 assuming everyone doesn't work until age 25 in bolehland and no one works beyond 64, there is still an under-accounting of the labour force of ~2m.
The housewife segment should be pretty big, otherwise people retire very early.
I wouldn't pat the back just because someone only record 0.5m as unemployment.
Sep 11 2025, 10:42 AM
Quote
0.0140sec
0.40
5 queries
GZIP Disabled