Heard from an ex colleague that his place had something funny happen:
January 2025 - Forced staffs of Dept A to go for a 3 months short certification course and the staffs will keep the certs to themselves BUT they are bonded for 1 year for the cost of the training.
July 2025 - Due to corporate buy out by another group, Dept A is deemed not required and had to be reassigned. All staffs from Dept A had 2 OPTIONS:
1. Take the redundancy package and leave but they must minus off the balance 6 months of bonding costs immediately before they can leave. The cost is nearly RM7,000 and some staffs are struggling to dish out RM7k immediately. They do not accept contra from the redundancy, must pay this balance only can proceed with the redundancy.
2. Reassigned to whatever post the company deems required by the company. Manager even mentioned in a sarcastic manner that it may be of no surprise that some of them might become cleaners or tea ladies.
I mean for item 1, is this actually legal? Because the bond is with the old management, the old management wants it repaid before handing over to the new management if redundancy is to occur. Also, they briefly mentioned that majority choice holds, meaning if most Dept A staffs choose for redundancy, all of Dept A will be going for redundancy regardless of personal choice.
Bond but something happened, Is this even legal?
Jul 4 2025, 09:00 AM, updated 5 months ago
Quote
0.0133sec
0.55
5 queries
GZIP Disabled