Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CCP smuggle hard drive come MY train AI model, 4.8 petabytes, using Nvidia

views
     
Stirmling
post Jun 14 2025, 08:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
291 posts

Joined: Aug 2019
this sounds like some stupid news story a tech illiterate will come up with just to drum up clicks
Mattrock
post Jun 14 2025, 08:24 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
395 posts

Joined: Dec 2017
Haha. Others can come to Malaysia to train and develop their technology, but sadly people here who have access to same facilities seem more interested in R&R issues.
TSpremier239
post Jun 14 2025, 08:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
173 posts

Joined: Sep 2021
QUOTE(Mattrock @ Jun 14 2025, 08:24 PM)
Haha. Others can come to Malaysia to train and develop their technology, but sadly people here who have access to same facilities seem more interested in R&R issues.
*
oooff..
JimbeamofNRT
post Jun 14 2025, 08:37 PM

the Original Lanji@_ Chicken Rice Shop Since 2002
******
Senior Member
1,902 posts

Joined: Sep 2012

QUOTE(Stirmling @ Jun 14 2025, 08:22 PM)
this sounds like some stupid news story a tech illiterate will come up with just to drum up clicks
*
Raffaele Huang is a reporter for The Wall Street Journal in Singapore, covering Asia’s technology companies. Previously, he mainly focused on corporate news in the automotive and technology sector in Beijing.
Ewww!
post Jun 14 2025, 09:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,033 posts

Joined: Jul 2016
From: Lol!




QUOTE
Despite Nvidia claims, Chinese smugglers have used live lobsters and fake baby bumps to traffic electronics


user posted image

Eeee! Penyeludup! Hang them!


ozak
post Jun 14 2025, 09:51 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
17,025 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Who offer to help this CCP to train their AI?

All the DC here is under the US company. They are strict who can use.
Juan86
post Jun 14 2025, 09:56 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
651 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
time to bring another tan sri into jail
icemanfx
post Jun 14 2025, 10:11 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
21,459 posts

Joined: Jul 2012



Earlier this year, a Beijing-based tech firm took over a lease for 200 AI servers that a data center in Malaysia had originally earmarked for an American cloud-computing company, according to people familiar with the arrangement.

https://www.wsj.com/tech/china-ai-chip-curb...=tech_lead_pos5

seather
post Jun 14 2025, 10:29 PM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


pretty smart for PRC companies..

but Malaysia better not FAFO

this must stop immediately.. there is little benefit for us beyond some property developers making money..
SUSlurkingaround
post Jun 14 2025, 10:41 PM

Rule of Law
*******
Senior Member
7,066 posts

Joined: Sep 2019
From: South Klang Valley suburb




QUOTE((lurkingaround @ Jun 14 2025, 08:07 PM)
.
Fyi, .......

Gemini AI Overview:

Several prominent tech companies and websites are blocked or banned in China. This includes major US tech companies like Google (including YouTube, Gmail, Google Play, etc.), Facebook (and its associated platforms like Instagram and WhatsApp), and Twitter. Additionally, many other international websites and services are blocked, such as Reddit, Wikipedia, and various news sources like BBC and The New York Times.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:
- US Tech Companies:
Google: Blocked since around 2010, including its search engine, YouTube, Gmail, Google Play, Google Maps, Google Drive, and more.
Facebook: Blocked since 2009, along with its messaging apps WhatsApp and Instagram.
Twitter: Blocked since 2009.
- Other Websites and Services:
YouTube: Blocked since 2009.
Reddit: Blocked between 2018 and 2019.
Wikipedia: Blocked between 2018 and 2019.
Various International News Sources: Including BBC and The New York Times.
- Other platforms and services: Many other websites and services are blocked as part of China's broader internet censorship efforts, known as the "GREAT FIREWALL".

Why are they blocked?
China's internet censorship aims to control information flow, promote domestic alternatives, and safeguard its currency. The government regulates and restricts access to content it deems detrimental to national interests and overall well-being. Additionally, China's regulations aim to foster the growth of its own digital ecosystem and local tech companies. 

.
*

QUOTE(iGamer @ Jun 14 2025, 05:55 PM)
Ban from operating within a country is the power any govt possess. But banning another country from operating or trading with all other countries in the world is only reserved for global super bully.
*
.
Seems, CCP China is the global super bully first.

Btw, has USA banned another country from operating or trading with all other countries in the world.?
.

This post has been edited by lurkingaround: Jun 14 2025, 10:43 PM
iGamer
post Jun 14 2025, 10:53 PM

Toxic ktards probably losers irl
******
Senior Member
1,374 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
From: Milky Way
QUOTE(lurkingaround @ Jun 14 2025, 10:41 PM)
.
Seems, CCP China is the global super bully first.

Btw, has USA banned  another country from operating or trading with all other countries in the world.?
.
*
U quoted so much but do u even understand what ppl commented?

PRC ban or limit foreign tech companies operating in China mainly due to PRC strict information control which foreign operators would not abide by. Murica recently wants to ban any country from buying Huawei chips, previously forbid other countries from using PRC 5G tech. U can’t even see the diff? One is ban within own which is their jurisdiction, the other is banning other countries in even dealing with PRC, that’s f@rking beyond their jurisdiction and borders, hence is international bully.
issac99289928
post Jun 14 2025, 10:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
291 posts

Joined: Sep 2016
From: muar, johor


fuxk the US law. China will use samarium (Sm) to force the US bow to its knees for at least 10 years. the US defence industry will go to a halt.

This post has been edited by issac99289928: Jun 14 2025, 11:06 PM
ukiya21
post Jun 14 2025, 10:57 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
755 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Taiping, Perak


Not say Chyna hardware no 1? Why need nvidia?
iGamer
post Jun 14 2025, 10:59 PM

Toxic ktards probably losers irl
******
Senior Member
1,374 posts

Joined: Feb 2016
From: Milky Way
QUOTE(Mattrock @ Jun 14 2025, 08:24 PM)
Haha. Others can come to Malaysia to train and develop their technology, but sadly people here who have access to same facilities seem more interested in R&R issues.
*
That’s why Murica target PRC, they are super determined to progress and succeed, and now threaten Murica position as the world’s global leader in almost every aspect.

Conversely, Murica didn’t ban small fries like Msia because this country and its syok sendiri ppl post zero threat to Uncle Sam. Yet syok sendiri Msian still got the audacity to belittle PRC which is right now far ahead of us doh.gif
SUSlurkingaround
post Jun 14 2025, 11:00 PM

Rule of Law
*******
Senior Member
7,066 posts

Joined: Sep 2019
From: South Klang Valley suburb




QUOTE((iGamer @ Jun 14 2025 @ 05:55 PM)
Ban from operating within a country is the power any govt possess. But banning another country from operating or trading with all other countries in the world is only reserved for global super bully.
QUOTE(iGamer @ Jun 14 2025, 10:53 PM)
U quoted so much but do u even understand what ppl commented?

PRC ban or limit foreign tech companies operating in China mainly due to PRC strict information control which foreign operators would not abide by. Murica recently wants to ban any country from buying Huawei chips, previously forbid other countries from using PRC 5G tech. U can’t even see the diff? One is ban within own which is their jurisdiction, the other is banning other countries in even dealing with PRC, that’s f@rking beyond their jurisdiction and borders, hence is international bully.
*
.
Your news source please for your above highlighted statement.
.

This post has been edited by lurkingaround: Jun 14 2025, 11:03 PM
issac99289928
post Jun 14 2025, 11:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
291 posts

Joined: Sep 2016
From: muar, johor


QUOTE(lurkingaround @ Jun 14 2025, 11:00 PM)

.
Your news source please for your above highlighted statement.
.
*
US declares global use of Huawei AI chips a violation of its export laws

https://www.business-standard.com/companies...51401298_1.html


SUSlurkingaround
post Jun 14 2025, 11:24 PM

Rule of Law
*******
Senior Member
7,066 posts

Joined: Sep 2019
From: South Klang Valley suburb




QUOTE(iGamer @ Jun 14 2025, 05:55 PM)
Ban from operating within a country is the power any govt possess. But banning another country from operating or trading with all other countries in the world is only reserved for global super bully.
*
QUOTE((lurkingaround @ Jun 14 2025, 11:00 PM)
.
Your news source please for your above highlighted statement.
.
*
QUOTE(issac99289928 @ Jun 14 2025, 11:03 PM)
US declares global use of Huawei AI chips a violation of its export laws

https://www.business-standard.com/companies...51401298_1.html
*
.
Is that USA banning another country from operating or trading with all other countries in the world.? Is Huawei a country.?
.

DValentine
post Jun 14 2025, 11:54 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
773 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: isudahinsap.flac


QUOTE(M4A1 @ Jun 14 2025, 04:22 PM)
sooner or later msia sure kena from US
*
tambah lagi PMX support palestin

huehuehue

40% at least kena
SUSFreshmeat21
post Jun 15 2025, 12:11 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
16 posts

Joined: Jun 2009

QUOTE
Despite Nvidia’s claims that “there is no evidence of chip diversion”


One side is WSJ claim without evidence, another side is Nvidia claim without evidence

done claim whistling.gif
issac99289928
post Jun 15 2025, 12:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
291 posts

Joined: Sep 2016
From: muar, johor


QUOTE(Freshmeat21 @ Jun 15 2025, 12:11 AM)
One side is WSJ claim without evidence, another side is Nvidia claim without evidence

done claim  whistling.gif
*
the more relevent question is who provided the info the WSJ ? why did WSJ seem it was the only one who got the info ?






6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0204sec    0.45    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 09:29 PM