https://mazda.com.my/bookcx60

offered in a sole 2.5G 2WD High variant. According to the price list on the ROI page, this variant is estimated to retail for RM200,510.40 on-the-road without insurance – the previous RM198,900 figure advertised by dealers is before OTR costs.

For more info, visit paulvinder's site.

ktard here say Masuda better than BMW

Means what? Low fuel efficiency compared to new one?

Mazda really said ‘premium SUV’ and gave us a shoe box with LED headlights.

Can get any new car with inline 6 engine, for rm200k?

i had to login just to reply,

gosh so ugly

ok mr.mercedes

nah, thanks to road tax system. you better off with EV that much better than i6/v6

wen mau bankrupt ?

Then bring up the price to 250k-300k la.

This car has a naturally aspired 2.5 engine.

The CX-5 2.5 TURBO is going for RM188k or something. That's like 12k cheaper. I don't understand the purpose of this vehicle.

Tak boleh compare CBU with CKD
Itu RAV4 CBU also more expensive than this

Don't say the inline 6.
If they launch the 2.5 for 188k and the 2.5T for 200k, still acceptable but 2.5NA for 200k? Good luck to your slow death.

2 years too late and with that puny 2.5NA.......

wah bye bye jap legacy automakers

lol they still gambling when jaina and the world moving on

if you dont understand then stick back with your camry je

Becum so ugly

i read Paultan few years back news , it said 3.3 inline 6 gonna cost us ~RM250k , are u ok with the price

Bigger , more premium RWD car

Buyers have been saying they want more high level than Cx5 but cx8 and cx9 too old already. The CX60 fit the profile for those wanting more space more premium than compact 5 seater.

Sougly and kosong for 200k.

Crv hybrid is so much better

somehow the front look so dated.. current CX-5 look more modern than this shiat

Japan full of old ppl in big corp management , decision making too rigid , too old skol...

People saying 2.5NA + 8 speed + RWD platform + CBU from Japan is expensive, remember how much the new Harrier is selling for? That is only 2.0NA + CVT.

You can argue the engine is underpowered but there is nothing wrong with the price. Obviously when you compare with Chinese brands in terms of bang for buck confirm lose, but sometimes buying a car is looking beyond the spec sheet.

Also conlanfirm this looks and feels much better inside compared to Harrier or CRV

This post has been edited by ZeneticX: Jun 6 2025, 04:54 PM

it actually looks much better in real

Buy already, you can tell people you drive a XC60 which sounds more expensive. Then when you bring them to your car, you say oops I mean CX60.

Malaysia market has shown they don't want new engine

Mazda cx8 2.5 NA sold most. Mazda 6 2.0 sold most, Mazda 3 1.5 sold most. basically the real ones buying are choosing smallest engine combo

there's no issues as long its enough for daily usage

those who keep saying underpowered etc sounds like they are trying to race their cars in sepang every weekend

if 10years ago, we all ok with Harrier 2.4 NA isnt it ,
Today seems like not acceptable, used to be only rival is bmw / mercedes SUV.
Today , we have China car for comparison, ppl change the way to view the product =/
Mazda & Toyota still old skol, for old skol market who still appreciate them.

KEK already predicted larr. Mahu bring 3.3 tu 280k u mau ka?

Mazda cx-60 inline 6 engine option is 3.3L .
Nobody wants to pay RM2.1k roadtax a year for Semenanjung price.
You look at rich Vellfire users , most ppl buy 2.5L engine despite so underpowered. V6 ones are minority.

This post has been edited by k!nex: Jun 6 2025, 05:07 PM

NA engine still have its charm. Linear power depending on how much throttle you apply. No turbo lag and seldom any reliability issues

Yang complain ini semua bawa Bezza dengan Saga. Nak 6-inline lar, might as well ask for V12.

only issue is not sure what they cut from the spec in order to achieve that pricing

hopefully they keep at least the active safety

That is because these ppl have not tried modern day downsized turbo engines that is initially popularized by Volkswagen.
Once they feel the flat torque curve starting from low rpm , their opinion will change instantly.

Turbo lag is hardly a thing for common passenger cars these days. Peak torque available below 2000rpm for petrol engines to 4000+ rpm. That is the range most ppl operate their engines. Turbo lag is a 90's thing and heavily modified engines.

This post has been edited by k!nex: Jun 6 2025, 05:37 PM

it still adds another layer of complexity. turbo engines run hotter which accelerates engine wear and oil degradation. there's no way around this.

but of course its not gonna be an issue for someone who changes car every 5 - 7 years and maintains their car accordingly

Baik beli [insert chinese car here]

Actually, for Mazda 3, 1.5L engine for 1.4 tons car is really underpower. It's like driving a Mazda 2 with full passenger + luggage.

2.5L for 2 tons car would be slightly sluggish, but not as bad as 1.5L Mazda 3. Only slightly worse than 2.0L CX-5.

Overall better than BMW, no.

Better interior than BMW of similar price, yes.

That one really underpower lah. The 1.5 is meant for Mazda 2 only. Mazda 3 needs the 2.0 at least. But if someone is stuck in traffic most of the time I reckon the 1.5 is still ok. Highway and uphill roads will be a struggle

For CX60 my main point was if people are ok with Harrier being 2.0 NA + CVT, then CX60 should be no issues with the 2.5 NA

This post has been edited by ZeneticX: Jun 6 2025, 06:06 PM

Yes. Good option for town car.

But town car at 120k is out of reach for most people.

I was driving my CX-30 for 5 days when I went back to my hometown, then came back to Shah Ale and drove my Mazda 2, suddenly I missed the extra power. Can't imagine driving 1.5L Mazda 3 which has the similar curb weight as CX-30.

Its 2025 Please Dont call it a "sports" utility vehicle if torque is still below 300nm.

bladdy embarrassing... looks pon tare sporting... performance pon tare sporting

just call it UUV or UV... - Unker Vehicle.

fugly

Haihz why phillipines got cx90 even and we have bermaz sell shit spec still to us


Brunei also got better models than us


What a joke my maid country got better cars

Is mazda really worth conti price?
Kekwa

200k want inline 6... wait long long...

99% of the car out there are below 300nm...

/k cakap 200k bagai rm200 je...

baik beli tesla!

Inline 6 will make the engine very long.

Most likely V6.

But either one will drink petrol like coffee, with higher fuel consumption, engine friction and size, it will be much harder to meet the emission standrad nowadays

have to agree

some things on paper / 2D not nice

when depan mata.......wow
then second blink
waaaaah

This is very true case, the actual car has a lot of presence to it, when it rolls up , you take notice

200k is consider cheap. U see fl5 is way more overpiced for 400k u get manual transmission n top speed 275km only lol. Better buy civic fe rs n upgrade to stage 3 then u get same performance for 160k.

for me 2.5 roadtax also already expensive.
2.0 turbo or pair with hybrid is better and roadtax still cheaper.

Mazda is the best Merc BMW

1 year old car sell for RM200k.

Malusia selow poke as usual.

faiure product. ROI invested for this CKD model will not get it return.
Bermaz will bleed like Nissan

https://www.automachi.com/2025/06/mazda-cx-...tures-revealed/
Sini tulis 12 Bose speakers

This post has been edited by oM41GoD_: Jun 7 2025, 01:37 PM

It's CBU from Japan



Very good spec for the money if you dont mind the engine

Bermaz test water only. 2.5 rwd go first. If sell okay meet expectations, possibly to bring in 3.3 i6 awd by next year (some branches preview car is awd variant seen from tailgate badge)

Just saying if you want 3.3 version then be ready for 3k+ roadtax every year