Women these day know how to play their card right , so hard to find true friend

Come on lah

In court with this type of evidence

It is already an indirect admission of guilt

Any lawyers would stress this kao kao

The judge verdict was actually quite reasonable

This one I must say, pity the guy.

You basically provided no counter-argument other than saying “this evidence is concrete” without providing the reason why it is “concrete” while I have explained to you in detail why it is not.

Try harder next time or don’t reply at all if you don’t have any counter-argument lol.

No counter argument? The case already go to court and the judge already decided the case

What is there to argue? The text clearly show what it meant but some people just won’t agree with no means no and think they are better lawyers than the defendant lawyer

Here we got k lawyers who think they know better

It’s actually so dangerous to see so many ktards don’t understand the definition of rape, sexual assault and CONSENT

This post has been edited by 30624770: Jun 3 2025, 06:47 PM

Do you have comprehension problem?

You said the text is “concrete evidence” and I said it is not. It is as simple as that. It has nothing to do with the outcome of the case.

The sentence “got out of control” is not as incriminating as you think since I explained that it was referring to the “hissy fit”.

We were discussing about whether the text messages were “concrete evidence”, not whether he was guilty or not because that involves discussing about other evidence like her claims and FIR reports and etc (which I did do a brief discussion but that was my view).

In fact my first reply to you was “Are you sure that the text messages constitute crucial evidence?”

If you can’t even differentiate the difference, like I said, don’t bother replying to me lmao because you couldn’t even form your own arguments as to why you think 1 is 1 but could only be a sheep that says “oh, he/she said 1 and so the answer is 1”.

And your statement “the judge already decided the case” seems to imply that there is no appeal available to the defendant, which is not the case here.

Just because a case has been decided does not mean that we can’t present our own views or discuss about it - if like that all defence lawyers can close shop d. Unfortunately I am not a sheep like you who is incapable of thinking for himself.

How much do you know about consent in the context of law anyway? That woman ajak for sex and then told him to leave but instead of making sure he left, she headed straight to her bed - you think that made any sense? She pancing him for several times and when he went for it suddenly she didn’t consent to it? After kena rejected twice?

You not a lawyer and thinks you know better. Go offer your help to the guy and appeal the case lah

The judge said said the woman’s recollection of the events was cogent and convincing, and was corroborated by text messages exchanged between the pair.

The judge clearly say that the text is crucial in supporting the girl statement lah. What is there to argue? You know the law better than a judge?

Fact is even if she pancing him several times, it still does not mean she gave CONSENT. A prostitute can also be raped even though she accepted money. In this case the girl changed her mind and clearly says no and she was recovering from drunkenness. So lying on the bed is a norm and not an invitation to piap.

Like I repeatedly say before, it's so dangerous for some ktards to think just because a girl says yes initially, they can't change their mind later.

Without looking at the actual text messages, it's hard to say really from an observer's POV.

From the article it says that she apologised for her actions, which reads as odd.

Sound more like that guy kena scammed