isn't this a noble action ? to discover the money was borrow to perform other -- but was used for other purpose --- audit negara also no said on this ? strange tetap betul strange 

Those are government money, to be exact Malaysian taxpayers money, so they have the right to know how the money is spent.

So NFC fund not used to buy condo?

So NFC got profit all along?

Sometimes I wonder if it is even worth to fight to save this country. The crooks seem to win all the time. On top of that the loser is often punished.

lol, time for PKR to kick out BN and bring in PN

songlap 250m also LSS wanna defend lol. wheres the cows yo wheres the cows... the 250m for cows not for condo...

the details of the case and the narrative presented are completely different.
the court agreed that public bank is liable for the information breach but not for the losses so in the end, they only need to pay rm10k.

most likely, they are not liable for the losses because NFC's reputation hit wasnt due to the leak in transaction information but due instead because of their own pecah amanah dan penyelewengan which became evident due to the leak in information.
only bodoh people would look at this news and think rafizi is getting sued for lying and nfc did nothing wrong.
rafizi is guilty of obtaining factual records of NFC penyelewengan.
the fact that the bank is getting sued for leaking the transaction information proves beyond doubt that NFC was guilty of penyelewengan.

i cannot brain how somebody would be fuking stupid enough to look at this news and think NFC tak bersalah.

Faultless the court says. Who owns the condos and where are the cattle?