Also, he showed the middle finger more than once. Also Garnacho shown it at least 2 times also. Sure it could just be young people doing stupid things etc BUT optics for the club matters so its dumb of these idiots.

Wait really? LOL

They play on opposite sides tho so not a valid narrative.

Thought Amad was lowkey humble but turns out that is fake.

Use your brains please, there were no bids that convinced the club to sell. So you go continue fighting imaginary people larh.

Cunha and Mbeumo as the 10s. I wonder who we go for up top.

This post has been edited by simmarjit: Jun 3 2025, 06:53 AM

Hence why i said they both are 10s? LUL

I really hope we get a proper striker larh, although Cunha and Mbeumo both will bring in extra goals (both outperformed their xG so the pessimist in me says that they wont do that here), we need a reliable outlet up top.

His salary is below 200K mate, all the other values are inflated with max possible bonuses.

Neither of them are actual num 9

No other choice unfortunately, hopefully we never have to see him here again.

Hojlund is a what then? When he said that its because he aint good enough, what else is he other than a 9? LOL

We were playing Giggs in midfield, brought Scholes out of retirement, Rooney in midfield .....easy to pick and choose narratives.

Not even close, he is in the 120K-135K ish side

It's not ability to spend, its ability to incur loss without breaching PSR.

The small extra money they got from TAA alone can cover like a 40mil signing no issue.

Liverpool (estimated pre-tax loss limit in 2024-25: £75m)

Despite breaking even since Fenway Sports Group bought the club in October 2010, Liverpool’s pre-tax result for 2023-24 was their worst ever — £57.1m was shipped, which on top of a £9m deficit a year earlier put the club’s combined loss at £66.1m for the first two years of the current PSR cycle.

Liverpool haven’t been funded by equity recently, so their losses are limited to £15million over three seasons. They do, however, have chunky allowable costs. The club’s infrastructure accounts for around £16m in annual depreciation charges, while they also run one of the more expensive youth setups in England.

We estimate Liverpool could have lost £75million in their 2024-25 accounting period (which ended on Saturday) and still have been compliant with Premier League rules. In reality, with booming revenues and player sale profits of £41.9m (around double the size of 2023-24), Liverpool were considerably more likely to have been profitable last season than to have strayed anywhere close to their loss limit.



Manchester United (estimated pre-tax loss limit in 2024-25: £141m)

As detailed by The Athletic, Manchester United’s PSR position is calculated using the accounts of Red Football Limited (RFL), rather than Manchester United plc (RFL is a subsidiary of the plc entity).

That’s a pretty big factor, as in recent years the pre-tax result of those companies has diverged significantly. In 2023-24, Manchester United plc lost £130.7million before tax; for RFL, the deficit was just £36.2m. Per UEFA’s most recent European Club Finance and Investment Landscape report, pre-tax loss figures for United were €22m (£19m at the exchange rate used in the report) in 2022-23 and €42m (£36m) in 2023-24 — an exact mirror of the pre-tax results in RFL’s accounts.

The difference stems partly from RFL including none of the costs borne by the plc as part of Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s share purchase in February 2024, but also from the structure of loans within the wider Manchester United group. RFL’s bottom line benefited from booking interest income on intra-group loans owed to RFL by entities further up the corporate chain, as well as recharging staff time to elsewhere in the business (sources have told The Athletic this time comprised plc-related business undertaken by executives, such as investor relations, rather than football-related activities). Foreign exchange differences in RFL were more favourable than at the plc level, too.

Based on RFL’s loss figures, it’s a struggle to see how there were ever any PSR worries at the club — though that’s only true once Ratcliffe’s arrival was accompanied by equity investment, which raised United’s three-year PSR loss limit from £15m to £105m.

There is also the complication whereby we do not know exactly which costs United were required to add back into their PSR calculation. Both the Premier League and UEFA use a ‘reporting perimeter’ that requires you to include all costs “in respect of (that club’s) football activities”, including any amounts that occur under the auspice of other legal entities.

According to Old Trafford sources, for the purposes of their PSR calculation, United are required to strip out any foreign exchange differences and the impact of intra-group loan interest. That means United’s pre-tax loss in its PSR calculation is larger than that shown in RFL’s accounts, though still below the loss in the plc entity.

RFL’s pre-tax loss across the 2022-23 and 2023-24 seasons was £55.1million, and United’s loss limit across the three-year PSR cycle is £105m following Ratcliffe’s injections of equity in 2024. After taking into account allowable costs, and adjusting for exchange differences and the intra-group interest, we reckon United could lose around £141m in 2024-25 and still comply with Premier League rules. In other words, they’ll be fine this summer, however surprising that may seem.

Man scored 20+ goals in his first season my dude ...where were you LOL

You think he was instructed to be a MMA player? LUL

Erm we still spend big tho so how are we not a powerhouse there? We pay the inflated prices but loads of duds.

So we are supposed to always only play counter attack?

And let me remind you, he hasnt gotten a full season yet yea but you were on him since day 1.

LOL you need to refresh your memories larh just because Woodward was throwing money didnt mean that they werent kedekut, Woodward era was like Glazers already here for almost a decade.

What we did with CR7 money? Why couldnt sign Tevez on permanent deal? Constantly seeing Chelsea and City signing all the big names back then and we did nothing.