QUOTE(sexysarah1992 @ May 15 2025, 12:23 PM)
Nope. If klia did increase airport tax 1000%, the airport can be properly upgraded.
SG is not 3 times more expensive. Its because the SGD value is 3.3 times higher value than RM.
So since the SGD has higher value, it means than you are able to get better stuff with a lesser amount of money.
Singapore spending SGD100 will get better quality stuff compared to Malaysia spending RM100
So in theory, Changi airport tax should be cheaper dollar to dollar compared to KLIA but no its not.
Changi airport tax is SGD47 while Klia1 airport tax is RM73
If you take 73/3.3, changi airport tax shud be only 22sgd but its not.
Changi is clearly overpriced . Thats why they are able to give the best of everything because its the passengers who are paying for it and the passengers feel happy to pay the high tax because they know Singapore is a high class country
If you want KLIA to provide the best of everything, then ask them to increase the airport tax to sgd47x3.3= RM155.
Are you guys ready to pay rm155 airport tax?
Tak payah agree ya. Ko agree atau tak agree pun I tak dapat sesen dari u ya.
To b40, everything is overpriced in sg, eu, uk, japan, korea, prc, aus, uae, qatar, etc.
QUOTE(khusyairi @ May 15 2025, 12:36 PM)
It's in parliament debate already la. News also report the same.
Logically la, if annually passenger increase around 10%-15%.
Within next 3 years it will reach 70million capacity. It will need about 5 years to build new terminal (basically same like new changi airport which expected to operate in 2030 even if built start now).
B4 T3 complete, of course expansion of T1 & T2 will cover increase of passenger.
T3 should be operate around 2033-2036.
It's not to build T3 next 15 years. Then operate in next 20 years. Not realistic based on annual passenger %.
if mahb forecast is liable, t1 2nd satellite would have built 20 years ago.
This post has been edited by icemanfx: May 15 2025, 01:08 PM