SHAH ALAM - Penggunaan trak yang tidak sesuai sebagai pengangkutan anggota keselamatan dikhuatiri akan menyebabkan impak kecederaan yang tinggi sekiranya berlaku kemalangan.

Menurut seorang veteran anggota keselamatan, Md Zaidi Sujak, struktur kenderaan trak tidak dilengkapi ciri keselamatan yang kukuh untuk melindungi penumpang terutama apabila digunakan di jalan raya.

“Kerusi panjang di bahagian kiri dan kanan tanpa alat keselamatan berpotensi menyebabkan impak yang tinggi sekiranya berlaku pelanggaran.

Jaring-jaring besi di kiri dan kanan sebagai dinding pelapik kanvas juga meningkatkan risiko kecederaan kepada penumpang.


https://www.sinarharian.com.my/article/7282...UsRAr-m_1v8tMlg

what he say could be true...

He said is true but penunggang ajaran sesat nak fitnah apa lj pon bole buat hal.

Sincerely salam takziah to the deceased.

But those penunggang using this issue to stir shit is just evil

whynot say the sand lorry is not suitable

Pakai kenderaan pun racist dengan mana kenderaan boleh dan kenderaan tak boleh.

Bukan ke semua kenderaan kena ada seat belt ke supaya boleh lulus Puspakom?

Takkan trak FRU tanpa lulus Puspakom kan?

Owaiii...

This post has been edited by new in IT: May 14 2025, 12:37 PM

those lorries are not fit anymore to bring people la.. no seatbelt..nothing.. anything happen and GGWP.. its a very old transportation method ..

Dare to kacau trak FRU or not ?

So finally Loke resign onot ?

then who allow on road?

Kecian, Pupakom pun tak berani periksa kenderaan ni.

Semua ni takdir Tuhan.

Kene rempuh macam tu, ko pakai av8 pn belum tentu selamat.

Lol! Yes, this. Good question.

- Okay wrong thread -

This post has been edited by Ewww!: May 14 2025, 01:33 PM

if u kena ram by a fully loaded truck.
dont think your 5 star lancap car can even save you.

tbh, i think if normal commercial lorry do this, it is confirm illegal.

Why not both?

Biasa la...kalau ada insiden maut, baru cakap ni tak boleh tu tak boleh

He saying the army truck seating is not suitable due to lack of seatbelt etc. which is true.....
He not saying whether accident cause by Lorry or FRU transport.

Basically, we already mandated baby seats for toddlers.
Moving troopers should mean proper seats ala what we get inside IFVs, instead of what they did in Band of brothers.

those lorri pasir very scarry. imagine u drive axia at traffic light and you see the lorry in your rear view mirror

BDM 40T, asphalt also can pour 60T.


lorry memang paid by trip, so confirm all overweight.....
but that's not the point of this clickbait.

the guy say FRU dieded so many because no proper seats and no seatbelt.
He no say FRU guys dieded because FRU lorry rosak
He also no say Lori pasir innocent

mcm ktard. Blame victim

woi setan. No proper SOP needed for truck drivers issit?

True also, how to ensure road safety of these personnel in a real crisis

if it is true, why allow such jalan?

Technical point of the truck structure not being reinforce with passenger safety mechanism at loading area.
even a 30kmh speed if hitting stationary objects, unstrapped personnel can easily flung out

This post has been edited by Ichibanichi: May 14 2025, 02:00 PM

FRU should switch to bus

Take it positively, truck ain’t safe way to transport ppl. In wars, can understand need to truck to quickly move large numbers of soldiers around in rugged terrain. But for peace time civil duty like FRU, don’t see why not opt for safer large transport like bus.

both side mau save money

Now then he said...

It’s not like they dunno. It happened before at karak many many years ago & what kind of action they took or recommend?

can easily retrofit trucks bed with detachable harness , plus add roll cage to make it safe® to transport personnel

or just ask them travel in vans.

riot police wear heavy gear nak naik bas pula ? lol

abam sado need to fasten your seat belt

FRU, Polis, ATM, Penjara....all exempted. Transport people but no seat belt requirement.
1 set of laws for you and me.
1 set of laws for them.

i wonder how old is the truck

no safety belt, airbags, adas.

no different from moving coffin.

What gear cannot fit into bus? FRU got high tech exoskeleton gear kah?

finally someone said it

basically no difference than sitting at the back of a pickup truck

This post has been edited by bigmac999: May 14 2025, 05:31 PM

yawn......habis siapo bagi kelulusan trak tu sebagai pengangkutan anggota......pigi la tanya macam mano dapat kelulusan..... LOL

Kecian Puspakom skrg kena tolong siasat buat laporan.

How about 20 to 30 yrs old school bus ? All these still running til today

Again need to saman Lorry operator , PUSPAKOM and JPJ and of course Ah Loke too for allowing unfit heavy vehicle to be operated on public road

Seat belt on truck is a must

saman for JPJ all go where ? if not to upgrade the infra ?
number plates money also where it went ?


nvm RM2 billion yearly for jakim more important.

The most obvious question nobody asks somehow is

How that sand truck got approval to be on the road? But of course... Blame it on the victims

Nothing stopping these departments/units/ministries/forces from using chartered buses to move their personnel for non-official purposes...

Airforce/TUDM can do, why others cannot? Budget tarak ka?

Army also I see he drive slow slow and when used unofficially it's usually used for shifting personnel with their house furniture... if Army lorry enter highway usually got convoy...

Ini FRU perasaan Federal kuasa besar so ingat tak yah kisah kot... nanti sudah upcar pulak.

If victim blaming is the only thing that came to your mind, u are super dumb simpleton.

Smarter ppl are looking at what can be learned from the incident to reduce casualty, and identified truck is not a safe way for personnel transport. Will u drive your family around with them not having any seat belts?

28 years old mang

Source

You willing to use your tax money on nee fleet of these? Surely songlap into millions

These are more expensive than normal FRU truck

The truck have more space to carry heavy duty riot equipment

Laif is cheap

Bahagian passenger belakang tak remuk.
Proper seat with lumbar support and seat belt may reduce the severity of injuries.
They might been thrown around/out during that accident.

So if FRU put in 60ton MBT you think safe ka?

There are reasons why the sitting is like that.

Its a fair comment if it also criticize the obvious and most glaring elephant in the room..

Well even elephants are not spared by unqualified truck drivers on vehicles thats not even fit to be on the road. lol

German New Iveco Eurotruck pun xde adas airbag tu,
Apa beza?

Memandai kau, gi kursus naik la bas.
Gi operasi trak handalan tu la masuk kawasan operasi
Kalo best sikit naik Iveco, baru itu je.

Lepas eksiden ni tak tau la
Setakat ni pun. Itu je SOP dia

The person who called out the unsafe FRU truck, do you know if he did or did not oso address the other issue?