Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why can't Pakistan and India be good friends?

views
     
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 09:34 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

Pakistan exist to destroy india. How do u expect them to make friend lol
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 09:39 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(maxpudding @ May 10 2025, 09:35 AM)
Destroy your butthole la
*
Betul la bang

QUOTE
Bleed India with a Thousand Cuts is a military doctrine followed by the Pakistani military against India.[1][2][3] It consists of waging covert war against India using insurgents at multiple locations.[4] According to scholar Aparna Pande, this view was put forward in various studies by the Pakistani military, particularly in its Staff College, Quetta.[5] Peter Chalk and Christine Fair cite the former director of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) explicating the strategy.[6]


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleed_India...a_Thousand_Cuts

QUOTE
The origins of the strategic doctrine are attributed to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, then a member of the military regime of the General Ayub Khan, who declared a thousand-year war against India during his speech to the United Nations Security Council in 1965.[8] His plans for the 1971 war included severing the entire eastern India and making it a "permanent part" of East Pakistan, occupying Kashmir, and turning East Punjab into a separate 'Khalistan'.[14] After the war ended with Pakistan's own dismemberment, he laid down the doctrine of continuing the conflict by "inflicting a thousand cuts" on India.[15]

On 5 July 1977, Bhutto was deposed by his army chief General Zia-ul-Haq in a military coup before being controversially tried and executed.[16][17]

Zia then assumed the office of President of Pakistan in 1978 and the thousand cut policy began taking shape. After the defeat of Pakistan in the 1971 war, Pakistan was divided and Bangladesh was created. The war clarified that Kashmir could no longer be taken from India by a conventional war.[18][19] Zia implemented Bhutto's "thousand years war" with 'Bleed India Through A Thousand Cuts' doctrine using covert and low intensity warfare with militancy and infiltration.[9][11][10]


This post has been edited by RT8081: May 10 2025, 09:40 AM
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 09:46 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(maxpudding @ May 10 2025, 09:44 AM)
Bleed =! Destroy

tongue.gif

Why can’t we just live in peas
*
Ok ok my bad. Lol

Tapi macam itu la gaduh since 1947 macam budak2 lol
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 09:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(accordvtec @ May 10 2025, 09:43 AM)
because of religion bah.
even in malaysia our unity are porous due to 3R as well
*
Not la, because of territory. Pakistan bitter because india helped bangladesh to become a country

This post has been edited by RT8081: May 10 2025, 09:47 AM
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 09:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(g5sim @ May 10 2025, 09:51 AM)
Cuz both counties are extreme left wing religions extremist. Wasbt Osama bin alladin hid n killed in pakupakis??
*
Pakupakis hide him behind Bush.
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 09:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(g5sim @ May 10 2025, 09:55 AM)
Hype but Obama n Osama were too much alike so he found him. Obama knew where he would hide if he was him he would hide in pakupakis. Terlulist think a like. Others would would think someone would hide between pakupakis in the jungle??
*

hahaha yea la. US has ground intel. Own pakupakis gave info
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 10:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(abelyap @ May 10 2025, 10:02 AM)
Nah, Kashmir conflict started way earlier when Pakistani invade independent Kashmir who in turn asked India for help
*
Yea, i was refering to this because pakistan has an ambition to anex khasmir and join with east pakistan. That ambition ended when bangladesh becomes a country.

Was reading about it somewhere

QUOTE
The primary benefit of Kashmir to Pakistan, especially concerning East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), was to strengthen Pakistan's claim to the region as a whole and to unify the country ideologically under the "two-nation theory". While not a direct economic or military benefit to East Pakistan, the Kashmir dispute served as a unifying factor for Pakistan, despite the geographic separation of East and West Pakistan.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Ideological Unity:
Pakistan's claim on Kashmir was based on the principle of the "two-nation theory," which argued that the region should belong to Pakistan due to its Muslim majority. This unified the country's leadership and public opinion, despite the distance between East and West Pakistan.

Strengthening the State:
The Kashmir dispute provided Pakistan's leadership with a strong basis for claiming national unity and solidarity. It served to rally support for the military and the government during times of conflict with India.

Political Leverage:
Pakistan's insistence on Kashmir's right to self-determination (as outlined in UN resolutions) was used as a tool to negotiate with India and to gain international support. This provided Pakistan with political leverage, even if it didn't directly benefit East Pakistan.

A Catalyst for Separatist Movements:
However, the Kashmir issue also had unintended consequences. The 1971 war and the focus on the Kashmir dispute exacerbated the already growing sense of alienation in East Pakistan, ultimately contributing to the secession of Bangladesh. The Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, recognized that they had much to lose economically, politically, and security-wise by being entangled in West Pakistan's conflict with India over Kashmir.


This post has been edited by RT8081: May 10 2025, 10:10 AM
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 10:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(accordvtec @ May 10 2025, 10:38 AM)
a little bit of this, a little bit of that. but mainly is because of 3R also.
*
In a way yes
RT8081
post May 10 2025, 11:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
355 posts

Joined: May 2022

QUOTE(Penamer @ May 10 2025, 11:33 AM)
I think India's Muslim population has been increasing in percentage as opposed to Hinduism. Not surprised if the majority is feeling threatened that's why such a push back against islam in terms of indian govt policy. Maybe indian govt believe that Pakistan is behind the Islamic conversions inside India?

Malaysia different, type c is going extinct, type I is going nowhere, so majority type m here feel safe.
*
Type i is already moving abroad.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0144sec    0.41    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 09:58 PM