Unlike Saddam who is just crack Gaddafi unlike liwat seems to be a very intelligent man and took care of  ALL his people not just his tribe but ALL of Libya . Unfortunately those ungrateful people betrayed him and was brainwash by US. I normally don't like most middle east things but this guy was a good man betrayed by his own.

He's a psycho. He has Quran written in blood.

Another one coming Capt Ibrahim Traore

ts u never heard of his personal harem? or choose to ignore it? lol, u know how he ordered his ppl to go kidnap attractive young girls then bring it to his personal harem and raped those poor girls then pass them around for his cronies then after that dump those girls at the roadside after they have 'used' up those girls

ts u never heard of his personal harem? or choose to ignore it? lol, u know how he ordered his ppl to go kidnap attractive young girls then bring it to his personal harem and raped those poor girls then pass them around for his cronies then after that dump those girls at the roadside after they have 'used' up those girls

Unlike Saddam who is just crack Gaddafi unlike liwat seems to be a very intelligent man and took care of  ALL his people not just his tribe but ALL of Libya . Unfortunately those ungrateful people betrayed him and was brainwash by US. I normally don't like most middle east things but this guy was a good man betrayed by his own.



Motherfackas like.Clinton and Obama protect US interest though it's bullshit and sacrificed him under false pretext.

Lol, it has been for decades US modus operandi, only you didn't realize it.

1. U.S. disrupts the nation harmony first by spreading misleading propaganda for many years.

2. Once the nation government reacts to quell the population dissidents due to misleading propaganda, the mainstream media reports them as government oppressing their own people.

3. Then US the savior, intervene by sanction, blocking trades, and frozen the country assets.

4. Then the country became much worse and volatile due to limited items on the supermarket due to US sanctions, so the whole situation escalate much worse and people started killing each other, etc.

5. US then help the group that they want to install as puppet, by providing them with weapons.

6. If the US favored rebel group failed, use mainstream media to show the brutal onslaught of the rebel group as "civilians".

7. Here comes "democracy" and "freedom" on its way.

He's a psycho. He has Quran written in blood.

Wasn't that Saddam?

just move on ts

he is fukking dead

just move on ts

he is fukking dead

That's what they say la but in totality he did look after his people. How can we trust any BS from media which may potentially frame him as rapist? We have some prominent figure child marriage lapist who got exposed few years back not saying lape is acceptable but unlike those useless figures I believe Gadaffi was framed in general.

He managed to.unite Libya because whole of middle east ideology is pure violence.  He united them and made sure their needs were met and give them good life. Unlike Talibun wannabe country like Afghan Pakustan and some SEA aspirational Talibun wannabe countries.

You will be fukking dead some day, and no one will remember you.

Dead yes but still he is good leader 90 pc population literate while here barely 20 pc can pass add maths. Which u think more useful in future. Rejeki where kotek pancut because holy man say rejeki but child bodoh or a literate and educated society.

who cares. Nobody will remember you or your shitposting either, lol

the thing about Gaddafi is that we dont truly know what he really was thanks to western propaganda

while there maybe some truth on either sides, but look at how destroyed as a nation Libya is now. was it worth the "freedom" now? its like that stupid propaganda video back then with Angelina Jolie in Iraq. "Iraqis will starve, lose their homes bla bla, but at least theyre free" lol fuck off

same goes for Syria on how they kept painting Assad as some evul dictator while they carve up his country kek

they got exposed his harem la, super duper big can fit alot of girls and got interview those victims and their families also, what if the victim is your mum or sister? or relative? or friend? no matter how good u said about him still cannot deny the fact that he did those terrible things during his reign

u go see Lee Kuan Yew, another hero also turned singapore into a first world country, but u got see LKY do these kind of terrible things? no right?
so yeah, i would rather respect ppl like LKY than gaddafi, gaddafi is just a demon pretend to be angel lol

If you reference to his UN speeches, infrastructure and housing initiatiaves he genuinely tried to do good and he is way more intelligent the our current leader .

Everyone got dark side u think thr Chinaman LKY so perfect ke? The sohai make opposition leader bankrupt by using judiciary like mamak to bankrupt opposition.

LKY how bad also wont be as bad as a dictator who kidnap tens of thousands of innocent young school girls and enslaving them to be his sex slaves then dump them on roadside to die after he finished using them up

Good, if you don't care, fck off, Gaddafi is someone worth to be remembered.

Are you a mod? If no? Then stfu. I can comment anywhere i like. That annoys you? Even better.

But we all die alone eventually, bruh.  Whats so wrong about that? Why so triggered?

Good, it goes both ways.

Because he was the one preventing immigrants from flooding Europe and elsewhere, he was about to turn whole Africa countries to become fully independent from outsiders and improve their standards of living.

And he died for that, in worse possible way, he get sodomize, beaten and decapitated in front whole world too see.

Hillary Clinton even bragged about his killing by laughing in glee:


The future of Africa generation shall remember this misdeeds.

Dunno about the whole Africa, but isnt Ghadaffi more invested in pan Arabism?

Anyway, the past is pretty much gone.

Maybe ppl here wanna do some reflection, thats fine i guess? But glorifying the past wont improve the present or the future.

Ppl always bemoan the collapse of the golden age for example, but chose to do nothing abt the present and future.

Hopefullh this isnt just another circle jerk session

He is more invested in kicking out bad actors from Africa and stop the reliance on US dollars and US banking system, by using gold as their reserves.

Libya has become the first country in Africa with almost zero debt to IMF and others banking institutions, becoming a truly debt free nation.

For that, they make an example out of him.

Dead yes but still he is good leader 90 pc population literate while here barely 20 pc can pass add maths. Which u think more useful in future. Rejeki where kotek pancut because holy man say rejeki but child bodoh or a literate and educated society.

Learning from the past is vital to not letting history repeat itself.

That's an odd comparison between literacy rate and add math. Malaysia has a literacy rate of 96% btw.

I had a Libyan university dorm mate. To me, gaddafi basically just sounds like the sultan of brunei. They provided a lot of benefits to the people from oil revenue (including overseas scholarships which my friend was on).

But at the same time, things are not super rosy, as you can expect. Leaders are super rich but not necessarily the people. No comments on harems and torture chambers, but don't imagine that gaddafi and his close family and friends didn't skim a lot of the revenue for themselves.

The question is whether Libya today is better or worse under Gaddafi?

The problem with Middle East and Africa is they have a lot of tribal groups that constantly clash with each other.

Whether they like it or not, if they want peace and development, they need a strongman to hold everyone together

Look what happened to Iraq, Libya and Syria today after their dictators are disposed

The country falls apart due to infighting

Thing is gaddafi himself wasn't really peaceful. Aside from being anti West, what people kinda ignore was that he also waged war against his neighbours Egypt and Sudan. In terms of development libya there really wasn't much - libya was similar to other Arab kingdoms heavily reliant on oil (libya is actually a bit worse off because they actually nationalised businesses which drove away private businessmen).

The irony is that gaddafi took power because the former king controlled all the oil revenue, and he ended up controlling all the oil revenue himself.

Thing is gaddafi himself wasn't really peaceful. Aside from being anti West, what people kinda ignore was that he also waged war against his neighbours Egypt and Sudan. In terms of development libya there really wasn't much - libya was similar to other Arab kingdoms heavily reliant on oil (libya is actually a bit worse off because they actually nationalised businesses which drove away private businessmen).

The irony is that gaddafi took power because the former king controlled all the oil revenue, and he ended up controlling all the oil revenue himself.

Thing is gaddafi himself wasn't really peaceful. Aside from being anti West, what people kinda ignore was that he also waged war against his neighbours Egypt and Sudan. In terms of development libya there really wasn't much - libya was similar to other Arab kingdoms heavily reliant on oil (libya is actually a bit worse off because they actually nationalised businesses which drove away private businessmen).

The irony is that gaddafi took power because the former king controlled all the oil revenue, and he ended up controlling all the oil revenue himself.

He wanted to direct Libya to an agricultural country.

these Middle east countries need a strong dictator to control, else they will just fight with everyone and the different clans....

He wants to united all Africa and trade oil in others than dollars.

So the west decide he has to go