what you smoke until you think other country will be salty of india?

Technically they are in a way.

Just differe4nt element divide them

This post has been edited by Lesane: Apr 28 2025, 02:37 PM

that region was not part of India after India's independece... there were a lot of issues and terrorism even then (although the phrase terrorism was hardly used back then).

and then India went into the whole mess... so the original question is why another country went into the region that is already in a mess and then claim someone else started it?

I also don't know why a country should surrender any land that originally doesn't belong to it.

Thats the problem

Kashmir-Jammu was a princely state ruled by a Maharaja (Hari Singh)

After independence, Pakistan attack / invade K & J and Hari Singh agree to accede to India in exchange of India / British help

If based on that, India has more claim over K&J compared to Pakistan.

At least that's my understanding

This post has been edited by Lesane: Apr 28 2025, 02:53 PM

In 1947, the Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir had a population that was predominantly Muslim, with approximately 77% of the population being Muslim and 20% Hindu. While specific figures vary slightly depending on the source, the general demographic distribution was a significant Muslim majority, with a substantial Hindu minority, particularly in the Jammu region.

so these muslims wanna be ruled by kafir?

your understanding and mine is the same.

hence its India venturing into the region of mess and not being able to resolve it.

having said all this, I am not so sure if India has more or less claim... what is sure is that the mess and issues were already there, and India went into it with its eyes wide open.

This post has been edited by Wedchar2912: Apr 28 2025, 03:00 PM

and committing war crime

According to scholars, Indian forces have committed many human rights abuses and acts of terror against the Kashmiri civilian population, including extrajudicial killing, rape, torture, and enforced disappearances.[49][50] According to Amnesty International, no member of the Indian military deployed in Jammu and Kashmir has been tried for human rights violations in a civilian court as of June 2015, although military courts-martial have been held.[51] Amnesty International has also accused the Indian government of refusing to prosecute perpetrators of abuses in the region.[52] Moreover, there have been instances of human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir, including but not limited to political repressions and forced disappearances.[53] Brad Adams, the Asia director at Human Rights Watch said in 2006 "Although 'Azad' means 'free', the residents of Azad Kashmir are anything but free. The Pakistani authorities govern Azad Kashmir with strict controls on basic freedoms".[54] The OHCHR reports on Kashmir released two reports on "the situation of human rights in Indian-Administered Kashmir and Pakistan-Administered Kashmir".

how can like this one?

pretty sure got many will claim its fake news... cos no way a democracy can commit attrocities...

K&J is a princely state. the Maharaj owns the state with the protection of the British.

The Maharaja can decide with who he want to joint and it is not subject to the citizen choice much.

If they decided to revolted and take over that is up to their choice (Which they did)

At that point the maharaja sort India /British India's help which was made conditional by British.

so it is democracy or absolute monarchy?

don't shift goal post when it fit

When war happen there will always be this kind of issue. something like collateral damage.

Sad but reality of war and conflict.

it even happen in Malaysia

What are you smoking, mana ada shift

At the point of acceding to India K&J were princely state which means semi-independent and a nominally sovereign entity of British Raj.

So as long as he (Maharaja) is paying his rental/ tribute / tax to the British he is considered as absolute monarchy.

good. we need a reduce global population. too many human causing too much demand for food which increase price

every year food price increase inflastion and so on so on.. due to human breeding too many

Desmond is totally clueless about what he is talking about. Just go slow at him lol

didnt know the us used to bomb allies haha

US & CIA purposely and inadvertently have been one of the biggest funders of Pakistani ISI and Taliban in the past.

You are fag yourself, he sacrifice a lot for India to be peaceful and in harmony together, completely the opposite to atuk and PuAS mentality.

Because if they do not settle their differences then, in the future, not even country borders could solve it, which is what they are experiencing now.

if malaysia close water to singapork, how ? will SG talk only or how ?

Lol Gandhi is attention whore . Real man is Subash Chandra Bose. The whore Gandhi and Pondan Nehru allow the formation of Pugistan Talibun. There will be less telolism in the world if gay Gandhi didn't give up Pugistan and Nehru lanjiao give up UNSC to Chairman Mao.

They gave up permanent seat in UNSC to appease chairman fatty Mao. Both are faggots.

This post has been edited by lordgamer3: Apr 29 2025, 05:19 PM