Now don't have.

That time I really felt like it when you went and find some ancient screenshot. Haha

Actually you want to go all in PPTP? Or how? Telco support on this is kind of fragile if you want to go all in a single stack.

PON is a Layer 2 network. When you say treat it like normal Ethernet, you mean you let the SoC switch chip functionality do it? Or you bridge it in Linux kernel?

My VLAN 400 was removed from LAN1 too. I didn't bother with it since I use VRF route leak as workaround. Now I can make calls as long as Im on Wireguard.

You are not wrong on this one. Telco is supposed to do either PPTP or VEIP. Not mix and match.
I don't foresee this changing in GPON since it's "working". Hopefully by the next last mile upgrade they are wiser.

Letting the switch chip do it then okay. ASIC FTW.

What domain did you test? Seems working to me.

The original argument was that public IP will be given depending on monthly payment in the 500Mbps plan.

This is very unlikely because technically the profile is configured by plan. There's no definition of pricing during the technical configuration.

So everyone, go get the 500Mbps at RM90.
Torrent client has support IPv6 for a long time. IPv4 isn't as useful as it sounds today.

Maybe system error? You could be the lucky one.
If you can afford the time to crash TM, go act like your contract expired and ask for 500Mbps RM90.

I went and check out Astro website.
For RM139 you get 500Mbps + their base 103 channels.

It still sounds more worthy than TM bare bone Internet only.
For people who want to watch TV, might as well get it. No?

I understand it is for existing customer only aka bundle.
But you can bundle for RM140:
https://www.astro.com.my/fibre?type=new&speed=500

Not only TM gives new customer nothing, their SWU sounds expensive by comparison.

Just go and apply for that Astro bundle if you are already paying 139 for Unifi.
Seriously, you have nothing to lose when Astro gives you more.

Best case TM gives you RM90 for 500Mbps

Look. Let's not be dramatic.
If you go and do a speedtest with CGNAT and without CGNAT, what's the difference between the ping time?

I would say they are all within margin of error of a shared network.

But let's say you really want to do the math, I say worst case CGNAT has a 2ms additional delay, you need a 500Hz gaming monitor to render that 1 additional frame.

Tell me you have a 500 Hz monitor.

CGNAT either run on dedicated service module or DPDK if running on off the shelf CPU. What's the time it takes to do a hashmap lookup? They are in micro-second.

I suspect your Windows Defender took more time to scan your game.

Wow. Uncapped XGSPON.
Mind sharing the ONU they are using?
PPPoE or IPoE?
Type of connection? RJ45 10G or SFP+?
The router you are using? Bridge mode with RB5009 or how?

If that is the case your friend would have show you a 40Gbps speedtest.
It is clearly just XGSPON and nothing more.

NGN is just a meaningless term. Mostly used in marketing to tell a whole lot of... Nothing

This post has been edited by kwss: Jun 20 2025, 11:45 PM

What did they say first?
I don't know why is it a scam. They were promised fiber, they were given fiber.

The only downside with ISP provided FTTR is vendor lock-in. The main unit actually act as OLT while all satellite unit act as ONU. Yes it's PON implementation. This is also the reason I am never interested in it.

Alternatively you can do your own FTTR using Corning ClearCurve fiber. They have single-mode and multi-mode version. You then just pick your own transceiver.

Obviously multi-mode requires a minimum of 2 fibers per connection but you save on transceiver cost.

With single-mode, you might need to install an attenuator if you are using transceiver meant for more than 2km to prevent it from laser burn.

Other than that, this tech works and it's not a scam.

I don't understand.
What's 100Mbps has to do with better WiFi.
Multiple FTTR nodes cannot possibly has worst WiFi experience that whatever hardware they are using for that "100Mbps".

Unless there's compatibility issue between the hardware, which is all too common in the WiFi space.

If it successfully connected, you correctly set it up despite the frequent disconnected.

What is the color of your D-Link? If it's black, try updating the firmware.

Did you hard reset and reconfigured it? Or you are using your friend's configuration?

You have the PLOAM password right?

People are now paying RM90 for 500Mbps.
Who wants to pay RM89 for 100Mbps?

This is SWU 5.0?
I never know they still give free speed upgrade.
Can share your full plan name?

If it's 66.75 for 300Mbps then it's worthy.

This is the OG Alcatel-Lucent ONU before Nokia bought over the company.
I used it for 9 years before it finally broke. From 10Mbps to 800 Mbps.
Definitely trouble free other than change power adapter.
Many more years later it keep LOS and it was when I decided it's dead for good.

How old is yours?

For context Australia NBN is using this too, with a different enclosure. 100% trouble free.

This post has been edited by kwss: Jul 4 2025, 08:13 PM

Just apply online for the RM140 Astro package and wait for TM to call you.

There's no legal binding until the port over is complete. This is the loophole TM is using for all SWU.
It's not like mobile telco where you have to pay for SIM card. For fiber broadband, customer don't lose a single cent.

This post has been edited by kwss: Jul 4 2025, 09:09 PM

Just tell them you decided to stay with your current plan and nothing change.
You lost nothing at all!