Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 UK reviewer don’t know why Nezha 2 so successful, Gave 1 star review only

views
     
TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 12:30 PM, updated 9 months ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


Readers might recall the moment in the mid-2010s when Hollywood blockbusters suddenly seemed a lot less, well, American. The big-budget movies of the 1980s and 1990s were often so alluring to young Brits because of the exotic domestic details to be found in the cracks. (All that unfamiliar branded fast food!)

But in the early 21st century, as globalisation powered on, and China’s cinema market opened up to western produce, a memo went round the business: no more knobbly cultural specificities that might alienate that potentially enormous audience, or rile the censors guarding the gates.

Now that China’s own state-supervised cinema industry has ramped itself up to a Hollywood-rivalling scale, one can’t help but be a little hurt by the fact that the favour has absolutely not been reciprocated.

Ne Zha 2 – a $2 billion smash in its home country, and as of two weeks ago, the most successful animated film ever made anywhere – is, for the international viewer (or this one, anyway), an absolute headache to sit through. By turns frantic, gaudy and puerile, it’s supremely hard to latch onto emotionally, despite the scads of roared exposition that break up the otherwise relentless fight scenes in the second half.

Like its 2019 predecessor, its plot comes from a fantastical Ming Dynasty novel that’s apparently roughly equivalent to Britain’s King Arthur legends. I can’t say I’ve personally read it, though I’d be interested to hear from scholars if the source text features quite as many incidents of a pig loudly flatulating in a blind man’s face (two), supporting characters unwittingly drinking Ne Zha’s urine (three), or Ne Zha beating up a tribe of marmots after vomiting in their soup (once, though frankly once is enough).

In my two decades as a critic, I’ve almost never felt so strongly that a film wasn’t made for me. But cultural relativism as an excuse only gets you so far. I’m not sure deeper knowledge of 16th century eastern literature would have made me feel the character design here was anything other than charmless, or the allegedly groundbreaking animation much better than a video-game cutscene.

The film’s deadening quality stems in no small part from its battles, which unfold at an alienatingly vast scale that has human-sized characters resembling particles of dust getting blown around a car park. As a display of raw processing power it’s certainly a flex. As filmmaking, it’s as mindless as Hollywood’s worst.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/ne-aha-...E69seIAJNQdPYKg

TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 12:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(xerox900 @ Mar 19 2025, 01:35 PM)
China just showed how big their market is. 2B USD box office from China alone
*
They say it’s fake numbers only
TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 12:44 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(iGamer @ Mar 19 2025, 01:39 PM)
I watched NZ1, after first 10 minutes I stop watching. The characters were not appealing to me (rather ugly to be frank), the humour was meh at best.
*
That is on purpose. The message is don’t judge a book by its cover.

All the previous Nezha look cute and live action ones are even sometimes portrayed by girls.


TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 05:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(iGamer @ Mar 19 2025, 02:47 PM)
When I said ugly character, I’m not just referring to Nezha, the other characters  design also looks unappealing to me. The art design just too generic.
*
I think you are the first one who say the characters are ugly.

What animated characters are not generic and not ugly? Let me guess, you love Japanese anime.

This story is based on a well known story from China and the look of most characters are already more or less established. How to be not generic ? Change the race of Nezha? I thought k don't like woke.

They already did not create a cute Nezha or some of the supporting characters are changed to look funny.

TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 06:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(seiferalmercy @ Mar 19 2025, 07:09 PM)
I agree with him.
*
You don't understand the story?
TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 06:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(dwks @ Mar 19 2025, 07:23 PM)
that is the point lol

nezha 2 literally mock CCP which represented by villain group, xijinping represented by main villain, the elite rich in china represented by the sect's members. really go and watch how the director mock entre ccp culture, 996, how the poor being bully & stepped by the riches, how no matter what the poor do they will always be outsider, discrimination, etcs.
*
They are actually talking about USA lah. The Chan sect is USA. That's why when Nezha reach their HQ, he kept saying so white which is referencing to White House. The HQ is the bagua but it also look like pentagon. The Chan sect is high and mighty everyone admire but in reality a lot of them are also demons pretending to be good. They claim to be demon hunters but in reality they got hidden agenda. The dragons are talking about Russia. They are blamed as bad guys no matter what they do. The few dragon who betray them and join the Chan sect are countries like Ukraine. Nezha is representing China. She look ugly and demonic but in reality just misunderstood as bad 😜




TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 06:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(kcchong2000 @ Mar 19 2025, 07:50 PM)
This is what people called grey area. Which let reader think themselves not all good sect are good and not all bad sect people are bad.

During the time Jin Yong write wuxia novel always on the grey area. If u on A POV, u are good guys, when u B POV then the villian is good guy. It more like where your morality stands

Most works for Jin Yong  is similar where he had move out from Good Guy, Bad Guy concept. Anyone can be pengkhianat, good guys etc. that is why his novel a lot of people like it.

But one thing I don't like Jin Yong Novel is most of his MC normally too powderful similar like Solo Leveling.
*
But the MC usually start very weak and kena bullied

Gu Long characters are the ones from the beginning already very powerful but his stories are more mystery wuxia.
TS30624770
post Mar 19 2025, 07:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(kcchong2000 @ Mar 19 2025, 08:03 PM)
But always terbelajar, then entah mana dapat kitab kungfu and etc.

The only MC that didn't learn powderful kungfu is in Duke of Mount Deer aje.
*
That one Jinyong totally change his style as it's his last book

Normally the hero very loyal to 1 lady but Wai Siu Bo is opposite. Hamsap, lazy and corrupt. He is an example of using brains instead of brawn.
TS30624770
post Mar 20 2025, 06:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(motodiary @ Mar 20 2025, 07:07 PM)
it is very obvious the producer/studio is using PIXAR/HOLLYWOOD productions as their source of inspiration there is totally no originality in style and direction, something the Japanese anime is capable and can be proud of., but the similarity is so blatant. it is hard not to snicker when you see the overnight fanboys pronouncing that Chinese animation has now taken over the world blah blah blah..
*
Everything Japanese good. Everything China just poor copycat, right?
TS30624770
post Mar 20 2025, 08:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(elm0001 @ Mar 20 2025, 08:37 PM)
holy shit it made 2 billion?!
*
It's more than 2 billion

Malaysia reach RM22 million within 5 days

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0190sec    0.54    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 01:04 PM