(Johor Bahru, 19th) In the “Chinese man was slapped in public” incident, the 65-year-old male defendant Abdul Razak originally pleaded guilty, but he had objections to the case, so the magistrate overturned his guilty plea.

The defendant then planned to continue to plead guilty, but the magistrate pointed out that no conditional plea would be accepted. The defendant immediately showed a regretful expression and turned to look at his son. His son was sitting in the audience, muttering: "Oh my God!"

Initially, the male defendant said he understood the charges after listening to them and pleaded guilty. However, the male defendant later disagreed with the facts of the case, that is, the content mentioned that the 21-year-old victim's right cheek was swollen after being slapped, but he said that the other party's cheek was not swollen. Then, the magistrate believed that because the defendant disagreed with the case, he overturned his guilty plea.

Non-Malay get ready get slap anytime now.

(Johor Bahru, 19th) In the case of a Chinese man being slapped in public, the court suddenly received instructions from the National Attorney General's Office halfway through the case to classify the case as released but not innocent or released without charge (DNAA) to reorganize the investigation report.

When the 65-year-old uncle entered the plea phase, the lawyer of the Legal Aid Foundation pleaded for him, saying that the uncle currently has no job and needs to take care of his wife and children, so he hopes that Magistrate Shamini will allow him to be released on bail with the minimum amount of bail. The magistrate originally postponed the case to April 19 to allow him to appoint a lawyer and related documents.

However, the chief prosecutor suddenly pointed out to the magistrate that he had just received instructions from the National Attorney General's Office to classify the case as released but not innocent or released without charge (DNAA).