This doggie really know nothing about law. The accused plead guilty but disputed the facts. Therefore the guilty plea is not unconditional. The court need to make sure the guilty plea must be unconditional. Dog will always be dog🤭😂🤣

Why AGC suddenly request for DNAA? not confident?

why dont AGC check everything before go to court?
takkan AGC dunno he was not represented by lawyer?

MISTAKE??

such a hot case well known .... and such a small case .....slap case only
is not even farking complicated murder case

u tell me MISTAKE? 
seriously? 

if slap small case u cant even handle well

how da hell i have confident in u handling more complicated case? like murder and etc

u tell me lor..............

i talk about AGC quality
u talk may 13
this is like chicken and duck talk     

u should ask urself

WHY AGC can make such a mistake on small case

WHY?

and 2nd question is...if small case cant handle well.. how will AGC handle much more complicated murder case and etc

Not really ah. Some cases also got no lawyer but the major thing for this case is the fella contest the charges instead of just pleading guilty and accept the punishment.

of course i cannot believe it is mistake

IF this is mistake...are u proud that our AGC handle small slap case also can mistake?

no wonder malaysia tak maju....simple small case also mistake...MALU AJE WEYYYYYYY

Apa lan putar halim is this lol.

There are so many ways to deal with defendant's lack of preparation. The AGC can request to delay hearing until defendant has a lawyer, who da fuck issues DNAA on such lame basis?

Then he should not plead guilty lor, obviously he is not well verse in his charge. Yes, better get a lawyer so can drag his case until become next LowYat thief

pendakwaan memaklumkan untuk mengklasifikasikan kes tersebut sebagai DNAA


now i know ..u know nothing about this case

already stated AGC mengklasifikasikan kes tersebut sebagai DNAA

then u said DNAA is not by AGC.
rupa rupa nya YOU APA PUN TAK TAHU     

i suggest u go read zahid case
same AGC request DNAA

Sehubungan itu, Shaarmini menolak pengakuan bersalah OKS dan memerintahkannya untuk melantik peguam bagi membela diri.

Bagaimanapun, sebelum tarikh ditetapkan, Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Nur Fatihah Mohd. Nizam memaklumkan pihaknya menerima arahan untuk merujuk kes tersebut kepada ibu pejabat AGC.

Majistret kemudian memerintahkan kes itu di DNAA terlebih dahulu dan akan dituduh semula pada masa akan datang.

pendakwaan memaklumkan untuk mengklasifikasikan kes tersebut sebagai DNAA

As I understand it, he wasn’t well versed in legal proceeding
He admitted guilt but at the same time argued the charge was wrong . His guilty plead wasn’t unconditional . I want there for this case but it seems prosecutor decided to change the charge and thus judge DNAA for this current one and to be referred to AGC for new charge which he said he will admit to

Nigga u don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Stop typing and making a fool out of yourself.

Shift goalpost and twist fact to suit your narrative to plotek Madani?

Prosecutor is literally under the jurisdiction of government of the time, which is Madani.
Magistrate A Shaarmini granted the DNAA at the request of deputy public prosecutor Nur Fatihah Nizam, who said they were ordered to refer the case to the Attorney-General’s Chambers.
If prosecutor no request, how to grant? The act of request itself is Madani's own action, that is not disputable, not debatable

Ftfy