But abang lori driver dindu nuffin

He was just gonna have some chat with the suv driver

The judge said the burden of proof of the right to self defence from the threat of bodily harm rests under the accused under Section 105 of the Evidence Act 1950.

"The accused failed to prove there was the threat of bodily harm against him and his wife from the deceased.

"However, based on all statements, the court found the existence to the right to protect the accused's property from acts of mischief which was the damage of the accused's (Toyota) Innova by using a baseball bat.

"But the right to protect the property did not extend to causing the death of the deceased," she said.

if 45 years old driver, ramp into victim repeatedly and kill the victim = 16 years old jail

then 73 years driver, ramp into victim twice, didn't kill the victim, being aggravated provoked in the first place..... ayam bet few thousand fine?