Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 NY Times reporter ask stupid questions at, China press conference

views
     
TS30624770
post Jan 25 2025, 12:46 AM, updated 11 months ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021



TS30624770
post Jan 25 2025, 07:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(ihm11 @ Jan 25 2025, 04:06 AM)
the chinese family of languages is tonal and any translation of a foreign name is mainly based on homophonic transliteration

based on dis rule alone there will most certainly be more than 1 character to choose for every syllable in a foreign word cos many characters have close or similar sounding tones

wat the lipoter was insinuating was whether china changed the characters used in rubio's name to wat was worded in the sanctions document so as to technically skirt the sanctions

and the answer to dat is most certainly no because they r sanctioning the person, not the name (or how it's written)

if jho low changed his name to "jo loh" or "jho lo", his ass would still b wanted
*
This type of question should not even be asked. It just show how clueless is the reporter and he’s representing a major mainstream newspaper
TS30624770
post Jan 25 2025, 12:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
269 posts

Joined: Oct 2021


QUOTE(iGamer @ Jan 25 2025, 08:29 AM)
I’ve seen this question being raised by multiple analysts, so it’s not a stupid question. See they avoided answering the question.
*
What is there to answer? There is no definite way to pronounce the name. It's an absurd question and the China lady was stumped by the stupidity of the question. LOL!

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0160sec    0.63    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 06:31 AM