Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Private Lease Scheme (PLS)

views
     
TSplouffle0789
post Dec 26 2024, 12:57 AM, updated 12 months ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,836 posts

Joined: May 2010



02:11

What is Private Lease Scheme (PLS)?



The previous government was looking to introduce a new Chapter into the National Land Code and Strata Titles Act, which would allow land owners (individuals and public / private corporations) to lease out their freehold land for development for a term of 30 – 99 years under a Certificate of Private Lease (Sijil Pajakan Persendirian).

This PLS will give a developer the rights to develop and construct condominiums on the land and sell them to the public. This gives rise to a pertinent question – what is being sold to the public, a freehold or leasehold property?

Buyers are actually “Renting” for the duration of the lease period
Buyers of PLS properties must be made aware that they are not buying said property but are instead merely renting or leasing the property from the sellers for a specific number of years.

At the end of the lease period, the future descendants of the buyer (lessee) must **** surrender***** the property back to the seller (lessor).


https://sg.news.yahoo.com/buyers-iskandar-i...-085042276.html


The case is as follows: IIB granted a lease over the land in Johor state’s Iskandar Malaysia region for a term of 99 years starting on June 26, 2013, to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Medini Land. It also has a 30-year extension ending June 25, 2142


Medini Land then sold this lease with a right to develop the land to Distinctive Resources, the developer. IIB also owned 20% of the shares in developer Distinctive Resources up until Dec 18, 2013, through Medini Land.

Through a joint venture between IIB and Distinctive Resources, the property in question, Iskandar Residences, was developed.

Between 2013 and 2014, the 63 plaintiffs entered into respective SPAs with IIB and developer Distinctive Resources. The property in the SPA at that time was referred to as a “lease”

QUOTE
A similar court case in 2020

This is not the first time that this has happened. In 2018, 107 buyers of another property development in MIM Johor successfully sued their property developer for misrepresentation and for breaching the housing development legislation.

The property development, The Meridin@Medini, is situated on freehold land owned by Iskandar Investment Berhad. Similarly, IIB leased this land to Medini Land for 99 years from Apr 15, 2013, who then sold the lease to Tropika Istimewa, the property developer.


The court held that Tropika Istimewa had committed misrepresentation by selling a lease under the SPA. Furthermore, the court granted a declaration that the SPA was invalid as it was in breach of HDA 1966 and HDR 1989, National Land Code 1965 and Strata Titles Act 1985.

Accordingly, the court awarded damages for misrepresentation and breach of terms and conditions under the SPA and ordered the developer to pay for damages for late delivery of vacant possession.



On 25 April 2012, the Company acquired the entire issued and paid-up share capital of


Tropika Istimewa Development Sdn Bhd,

a private limited company incorporated in Malaysia, with an authorised share capital of RM100,000 comprising 100,000 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each,


of which 2 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each have been issued and fully paid-up, for a cash consideration of RM2.00.


Singaporean kena tipu?

Anyone know any jb condo project is APLS?

This post has been edited by plouffle0789: Dec 26 2024, 01:10 AM
pandah
post Dec 26 2024, 01:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
719 posts

Joined: Jul 2011

Why the gov want to introduce such scheme? It is very predatory and will fck up a lot of ppl.
SUSSihambodoh
post Dec 26 2024, 01:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
436 posts

Joined: Dec 2021

Ktards: Surrender what surrender? Landowner must allow the renewal of the lease for 1000 ringgit. If not must compensate to descendants of buyer.

This post has been edited by Sihambodoh: Dec 26 2024, 09:15 AM
TSplouffle0789
post Dec 26 2024, 01:07 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,836 posts

Joined: May 2010

QUOTE(pandah @ Dec 26 2024, 01:01 AM)
Why the gov want to introduce such scheme? It is very predatory and will fck up a lot of ppl.
*
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/buyers-iskandar-i...-085042276.html


The case is as follows: IIB granted a lease over the land in Johor state’s Iskandar Malaysia region for a term of 99 years starting on June 26, 2013, to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Medini Land. It also has a 30-year extension ending June 25, 2142. Medini Land then sold this lease with a right to develop the land to Distinctive Resources, the developer. IIB also owned 20% of the shares in developer Distinctive Resources up until Dec 18, 2013, through Medini Land.

Through a joint venture between IIB and Distinctive Resources, the property in question, Iskandar Residences, was developed.

Between 2013 and 2014, the 63 plaintiffs entered into respective SPAs with IIB and developer Distinctive Resources. The property in the SPA at that time was referred to as a “lease”
Chisinlouz
post Dec 26 2024, 02:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
848 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


Since the ownership will always be developer, it would make sense if it's priced half or less than freehold property.

This post has been edited by Chisinlouz: Dec 26 2024, 02:38 AM
corallinkz
post Dec 26 2024, 04:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,387 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: 192.168.1.1



QUOTE(Chisinlouz @ Dec 26 2024, 02:35 AM)
Since the ownership will always be developer, it would make sense if it's priced half or less than freehold property.
*
Why so, they dont have to have to follow the half price or less. Land getting limited and the price is up to them
gashout
post Dec 26 2024, 05:38 AM

⭐ My stars are growing ⭐
*******
Senior Member
5,741 posts

Joined: Apr 2019
That's why better just put money in epf.. Property gives you unlimited headache..

What 2nd home, holiday home. Don't. Just do Airbnb agoda or booking.com.
cfa28
post Dec 26 2024, 06:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,830 posts

Joined: Jan 2012


Kuching kata jangan

who is the original land owner.. meow
seather
post Dec 26 2024, 06:39 AM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


lazy and greedy investor don wan to hire own lawyer to review the agreement without signing.. padan muka la..

i hired my own lawyer when i planned to buy a condo in australia..
tatmeng
post Dec 26 2024, 06:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
191 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


Any lawyer can come in to give unbiased view?
Chisinlouz
post Dec 26 2024, 11:04 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
848 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(corallinkz @ Dec 26 2024, 04:49 AM)
Why so, they dont have to have to follow the half price or less. Land getting limited and the price is up to them
*
Until property agent tell the world freehold property should priced double up or more so that this scheme looks affordable.

Inb4 can't afford don't buy

This post has been edited by Chisinlouz: Dec 26 2024, 11:05 AM
Jazted
post Dec 26 2024, 11:50 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
542 posts

Joined: Apr 2022
This should be resolve soon....medini going to be converted to____ title..
Cadence16
post Dec 26 2024, 08:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Feb 2022
QUOTE(Chisinlouz @ Dec 26 2024, 02:35 AM)
Since the ownership will always be developer, it would make sense if it's priced half or less than freehold property.
*
The developer does not own the land. They only own it temporarily to develop and sell. Iskandar Investment Berhad owns the master lease. Once strata title issued, the developer is out of the picture. Some developments already got their strata titles issued.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0173sec    0.71    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 12:32 PM