QUOTE(Exoflare @ Dec 14 2024, 09:40 AM)
The wild thing is that each frames itself as a way to undo stupidity but in reality it is likely more stupidity as a result of
tebuk atap and mass scale manipulation that will take place rather than any meaningful democratic change in all scenarios 🥲
Well, I am glad that you got to the main point.
What you described is a problem of rule of law, which is closely linked to democracy but has a distinct nature in the functioning of the country.
I'm sure everyone knows Malaysia's track record for the rule of law. That's what Najib did when he changed AG and sacked his ministers. Or when Mahathir did when he changed the federal court judges.
The thing with modern Western democracies is that they come with a package - rule of law, democracy, freedom, human rights, etc., a set of values closely linked to each other.
The Malaysian system is Western democracy in its framework. But we may not practice all the values that they do, nor did we interpret them like the western countries.
Human society is a complex organization. While we might have adopted the structures of Western democracy, the inner stratum of the people holds different values. These inner strata, such as Eastern and Islamic values, often conflict with the assumptions of the Western system. This clash can create tension and instability, hindering the effective functioning of democratic institutions. In terms of governing, finding a way to reconcile these differing values and move forward is the key.