QUOTE(khusyairi @ Jan 13 2025, 02:59 PM)
I want an AI that smarter than me.
Unfortunately, I am wrong & give too much expectation for chatgpt.
To be frank, wikipedia will give much better info than chatgpt.
Maybe my question, too complex for chatgpt to answer & chatgpt not enough historical data to support it (maybe the system too young).
The response will only be as good as the prompt, shit prompt = shit response.Unfortunately, I am wrong & give too much expectation for chatgpt.
To be frank, wikipedia will give much better info than chatgpt.
Maybe my question, too complex for chatgpt to answer & chatgpt not enough historical data to support it (maybe the system too young).
Especially true for o1.
Most ppl don't use it effectively, its true that it is not foolproof yet, cannot simply ask and get good response.
But people that are already using it effectively now will get way ahead of the others.
If u want to use it like a search engine, better use Perplexity. That is more built for purpose.
This post has been edited by DogeGamingPRO: Jan 13 2025, 03:18 PM
Jan 13 2025, 03:16 PM

Quote
0.0194sec
1.02
6 queries
GZIP Disabled