Wanna fitnah but bodoh.

1) Amirul Feisal Wan Zahir was only appointed to Khazanah MD in 2021. The brother has been in Xeraya Capital as CEO since 2012.

2) First, it says Acutus Medical don't have a website. Just click on the damn link la: https://www.acutusmedical.com/us/ - furthermore, they were invested since 2011 and it was listed in 2020 at USD24 - unless they can prove Xeraya hasn't recouped the investments I'll hesistant to say they lost money on it.

3) AriaCV - again accuse no website. Just click on the link bodo: https://ariacv.com/ - here's the pitchbook link showing how much they have raised - https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/107007-49#timeline

4) ConforMIS - they invested in 2011 I guess - which is pre-IPO. Why does this idiot think they paid USD14 for the shares? They invested a full 4-5 years prior to listing - when you know, it was not worth the USD14-15 yet. - here's the pitchbook link also https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/11467-09#captable

5) I don't think the person understands the nature of PE funds. Most of them shit the bed, but thats the point of PE fund because you are chasing for the unicorn that covers the rest of the investment. For example, they also diverse ViewRay at around USD8-10 looking at the timeline, which should make them quite a bit given they went in below the IPO price or USD5.

Can. One can declare the conflict of interest and remove themselves from the decision making.

Reality tu you buat pandai pandai la.

Temasek isn't really a great comparison. They are rich because Singapore is rich. Their 10 year TSR is at 6%, last year I think it was negative.

https://www.temasekreview.com.sg/

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/temas...-turns-negative

Temasek invested like SGD200-300mil on Byju. Today Byju is worth zero, even worse than FV.

https://www.techinasia.com/byjus-investors-...ange-leadership

https://cxotoday.com/news-analysis/a-byjus-...-indian-edtech/

They also pump in 300+mil in Unacademy, now also in trouble.
https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/una...9924145779.html

Not all that glitters is gold.

Ownself say temasek now suddenly switch to Singapore.

Gagal.

I quote you back la. You initially say Temasek >>> Khazanah. I showed you it's not, their average TSR over 20 years is around 7%, which is lower than the S&P500 index. Their fund grew because the Singapore government makes money. Singapore government =/= Temasek.

Then when I showed the data, you suddenly switch to say Singapore government is good, which I never disputed. But Singapore > Malaysia is not the same as Temasek > Khazanah.

I know we like to bash Malaysia, I also think FV was seriously stupid investment but holding another poor example as a shining example of "good" doesn't work when that example is also poor.

Exactly, so why wanna do Temasek >>> Khazanah?

Just Khazanah is bad cukup.

Nak protek sangat using bumi card that is what we get.

https://www.nst.com.my/business/corporate/2...rs-khazanah-pnb

They never check financial statement ke?